News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 Cartoons/Comics/Humor
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  Asia-Pacific
China's Ex-FDA Head Condemned to Death over Big Pharma Bribes
By Stephen Fox
Editor of New Mexico Sun News
FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach

Despite China's draconian lack of civil liberties and its unequaled penchant putting its citizens to death, especially rowdy and "seditious" Tibetans, once in a great while, China justly takes an appropriate judicial action, especially when its government officials are embarrassed by two major recent scandals within one month, the pet food fiasco and the substitution of diethylene glycol for glycerine, leading to at least hundreds of deaths in Central America and India, from poisonous toothpaste. Zheng Xiaoyu, the ex-head of China's FDA, was sentenced to death for accepting $832,000 in drug company bribes.

The USA is in the middle of a drug and food safety crisis, which extends to nations which ludicrously depend on the ghastly violations in the "high tandards" of the FDA. How is it that FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D. gets his "get out of jail" card, based on the inherent flaws in our so-called "system?" Henry Waxman (D-CA), Chairman of House Oversight and Government Reform, forced von Eschenbach this past Wednesday to testify on failures to warn Americans of the cardiovascular risk of death from taking Avandia, a $3 billion-a-year diabetes drug made by GlaxoSmithKline.

Statistics obtained from the company's own research predicted that 35,000 people would die taking Avandia last year; FDA chose to ignore these risks! von Eschenbach's testimony will cover up FDA's lies. He will lament a lack of FDA funding, but, truly, the FDA neither is incompetent nor under funded. The truth is that the FDA does precisely what they want to do, to cater to corporate interests and please their corporate masters. "The point is that we need to look at the role of the FDA in being a bridge to the future, not a barrier to the future," he said recently in his office in Rockville.

Responding to a suggestion that promoting collaborations with drug manufacturers, including an attempt to modernize human testing and finding genetic markers to predict suffering from side effects, may not be politic, von Eschenbach said the FDA is not working solely with pharmaceutical companies. "It's with everyone," he said, including government agencies and independent scientists. He defended the Avandia case, saying, "I believe we did it right with regard to Avandia." Waxman called FDA's failure with Avandia's safety after it went on the market "a major failure of our system.

The FDA never required the manufacturer to [conduct] a thorough post-market study of Avandia's heart risks." The hearing was scheduled as a result of a recent report in The New England Journal of Medicine that linked Avandia to increased risk of heart attacks.

The timing couldn't be worse for the FDA as Waxman prepares the House version (HR.1561) of the Senate drug safety bill, and the Senate version is Big Pharma's fake safety bill. Will the House put real teeth in the legislation? Avandia problems are the tips of the FDA iceberg. The truth becomes progressively more frightening. Collusion with the very industries the FDA is supposed to regulate has reached staggering proportions, and this is no accident during the Bush Administration, resulting in deaths and injuries to millions of Americans, all for drugs' companies' profits.

For example, the antibiotic KETEK, which FDA approved, even knowing it would injure children. Von Eschenbach threatened FDA scientists who spoke out. Iowa's Republican U.S. Senator Charles Grassley stated: "The allegations of misconduct in this case are as bad as I've heard yet. It looks like the FDA caught the drug company red handed and let them get away with it. On top of that, the FDA failed to set the record straight and, in fact, continues to cite a discredited safety study as a principal reason to feel okay about using this drug."

Another example: antipsychotic Zyprexa, which FDA approved for use in adult schizophrenics knowing that the drug caused obesity and diabetes. FDA allows billions of taxpayer dollars to be given to children to treat mild behavioral issues, an unapproved use that leads to poor health and disease.

FDA hides risks of drugs so that drug companies can turn them into best sellers, selling them in ways that were never approved in the first place.

Safety problems are reported; FDA fails to act, partially so it won't look bad for approving the drugs; partially to continue the billions in profit for companies, and partially because FDA employees are jockeying for high-paying jobs in the industry that is being regulated!

However, don't conclude that the FDA is incompetent! In fact, FDA scientists routinely warn the directors of problems, who then intentionally decline to protect consumers. The economic position of drug companies is always placed ahead of human health. This is a dereliction of duty of the highest and most despicable order, and these abuses are just as bad or worse in the context of our adulterated food supply: GMO foods, additives, chemicals allowed in food, and chemicals allowed as flavoring agents and sweeteners. The FDA has no intentions of toxicity of genetically modified food; it already even prevents labels that would give consumers any alarming details, and it suppresses information about natural ways to improve health.

This ghastly business is all entirely intentional.
China just gave the death sentence to its former FDA chief. In America we maybe conduct hearings, yet ultimately do nothing. Big Pharma and Big Biotech manipulate the FDA, the White House, and most of Congress, and their profits are above all and sacrosanct. Andrew von Eschenbach has never hidden his agenda; Americans just aren't paying attention! The top priority of the FDA and von Eschenbach's dream is to bring new biotech drugs to the market with minimal safety testing and then conduct experiments on individuals as the
drugs are used in clinical practice. Something like Dr. Mengele's experiments in the concentration camps, this is called the "Critical Path Initiative."

Von Eschenbach states that this is the top priority of the FDA for many years to come (not food or drug safety). Despite his phony lofty goal of ending cancer by 2015, FDA critics recognize that von Eschenbach is an oncologist who wants to create a cancer industry in which nobody is ever cured; they are just subjected indefinitely to more expensive medications. Von Eschenbach led this effort for many years in Bush I's "C-Change," a group smoothing the development of Big Biotech drugs for profitable cancer "treatment."

Von Eschenbach took the top job at the National Cancer Institute to advance this agenda. As its director, he diverted billions of dollars of research funding into C-Change companies, away from basic cancer research. Tommy
Thompson, then head of Health and Human Services, approved a waiver allowing von Eschenbach to remain at C-Change while he headed the National Cancer Institute, the worst conflict of interest imaginable. In October 2006 von
Eschenbach was appointed to head the FDA, holding three positions (C-Change, head of National Cancer Institute, and FDA Commissioner). No questions have ever been asked regarding his ties to Big Biotech. Von Eschenbach wants to
make the FDA part of the drug development business, including licensing and marketing rights for the drugs the FDA helps develop, resulting in tens of billions of dollars of "conflicting interests."

Senate Bill S.1082 and House bill HR.1561 could result in sweeping FDA "reform." Will this legislation accomplish anything beneficial? Lobbyists from Big Pharma were able to influence the Senate to neutralize any real reform. Buried within this legislation is an attack on dietary supplements.
Dietary supplements have always been challenged by FDA because they are safer and more effective than drugs. FDA acts as a police-force bully to crush competition and keep Americans ignorant about proven homeopathic venues to
treat and to prevent illnesses. Bill S.1082 permits FDA to apply drug-related risk benefit analysis to the safety of food and dietary supplements and remove commonly used products from the market at their whim.

At least one hundred thousand people tragically die per year at the hands of Big Pharma. Several million are injured so seriously they have to go to the hospital. FDA intentionally withholds from doctors and patients the true risks for drugs despite warnings of its own safety scientists and from independent experts. There is no question that FDA top management deserves the charge of "dereliction of duty." What if Dr. von Eschenbach were held to the same standards of punishment recently demonstrated in China's condemnation to death of its former FDA director? What will it take to wake the American public and consumers from their state of catatonic indifference?

Stephen Fox gratefully acknowledges the insights of the New York Times and Gardiner Harris, Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, Congressman Henry Waxman of Beverly Hills, Byron Richards, Mike Adams, Kenneth Stoller, M.D., and H.J. Roberts, M.D. in this analysis.



Related Articles
    Advanced Cell Technology and CHA Bio & ...
    Obama Annuls Edict Against Stem Cell Research
    200 Ex-Diplomats Endorse Obama
    Obama's Presidency Could Galvanize 30 Million ...
    Obama Needs to Hammer Economic, Foreign Policy ...
    Beijing Olympians' Health vs. Air Pollution
    Koreans Absolutely Correct to Object to US ...
    New Mexico Gov. Richardson: Best USA Secretary ...
    2-Week-Old Twins Overdosed by 1,000 Times
    Gorbachev Asked to Lead Next USA President Out ...
    What Does Coca Cola's Dasani Bottled Water ...
    The Economics of Failure
    Phytonutrients: Biochemistry of How Healthiest ...
    Resolving the Worsening Crisis at the FDA
    Expectations for New UN Sec. Gen. Ban Ki-Moon


In 1980, Stephen Fox founded New Millennium Fine Art, a Santa Fe gallery specializing in Native American and Landscape, and is very active in New Mexico Legislative consumer protection politics, trying above to get the FDA to rescind its approval for the neurotoxic and carcinogenic artificial sweetener, Aspartame. In a strictly legislative context, his most important writing has been for the Hawaii Senate. In his capacity as Contributing Editor of the Santa Fe Sun News, Fox recently interviewed Mikhail Gorbachev.

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange