News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 Cartoons/Comics/Humor
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  Europe
CSR – Genuine Principle or Marketing Wheeze?
Is It About Real Philanthropy or Simply the Bottom Line?
By Shane Clarke
London Correspondent
Is CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) genuine principle or marketing wheeze?

The CBI in the UK defines CSR as “an acknowledgment by companies that they should be accountable not only for their financial performance, but for the impact of their activities on society and/or the environment.” However, acknowledging is one thing, but genuinely making an effort to make things better is entirely another. For instance, how many of us have acknowledged that the shed needs clearing out, then either done nothing at all or made a token gesture to keep the wife quiet?

There is no doubt that CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) is an important part of the modern business. It’s good PR, and it can even improve profits. However, this raises the question – do companies adopt CSR out of genuine concern for the environment and the communities around them, or is it simply one more weapon in the marketing department’s arsenal?

Obviously, there are companies out there who really do see CSR as just that – a responsibility, not just a PR exercise. The Co-Operative Group, for instance, has long been recognised for its ethical policies and transparency, The Boots Group plc works closely with the Nottinghamshire Health Authority to promote health in their local community, and Cadbury’s, the chocolate maker, was established as a philanthropical venture.

Unfortunately, there are many companies whose idea of CSR is to simply have a pot of money available for anyone who passes their qualification process, and when it’s gone that’s it until the new financial year. These charitable donations are admirable, but more often than not it results in the biggest charities getting the lion’s share of the pot, while smaller charities get little or nothing, and find themselves scrabbling around for scraps wherever they can find them or simply being forced to shut down altogether. Worse still is that local communities get nothing.

When you look at this issue you see that there are hundreds of companies with CSR programmes. However, when you consider how many companies there are in the world, you can see that for every company that does get involved, there are literally hundreds of others which do absolutely nothing.

Many of these companies are protected to some extent by their low profiles, and operate below the radar. Larger corporations, however, because of their position, are forced to get involved for fear of public criticism. BP, for instance, was criticised for not spending enough money on preventing oil spills, resulting in it developing various CSR programmes. It makes you wonder how many of these companies would do nothing if they could get away with it.

For me, the biggest problem with CSR is that, while admirable, it is often misguided. HSBC, for instance, have an excellent initiative in their Global Environment Efficiency Programme (GEEP). This is dedicated to reducing the company’s carbon footprint, and involves many initiatives such as developing renewable energy sources and environmental protection. Their Future First programme is fantastic, and for many would represent what real CSR is all about. This programme operates in 43 countries worldwide and looks to educate and protect disadvantaged children. The story of Bafana, a young boy in South Africa who was left orphaned after his parents died is particularly heartwarming. The Future First programme meant that he was found, and given food, shelter, education and medical care to try to give him the best chances in life as possible.

Both GEEP and Future First are 5-year programmes, and are a shining example of what CSR should be. However, my complaint is this: GEEP has a budget of £45 million, while Future First has a budget of only $10 million. Shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t the energy companies be focusing the majority of their money on the environment since their work most directly affects it? Shouldn’t HSBC focus more of their budget on communities and excellent programmes like Future First?

Perhaps there should be more co-ordination between major multinationals in their CSR ventures, with companies focusing more on the areas they are more closely involved in. For instance, if BP and HSBC were to combine their efforts, with BP focusing on climate control and HSBC focusing on communities, imagine how much progress could be made. Imagine if companies got together and agreed individual areas to focus their CSR programmes on. A CSR Alliance, if you will. It really would “share the wealth” so to speak, and would ensure that instead of focusing attention on one or two areas, there would be help for everyone. Wouldn’t that be great? Maybe then we could move a little closer to the great John Lennon’s wish for us all: “Imagine all the people sharing all the world...”

Just imagine...



Related Articles
    Derek -- Simply Brilliant
    Dara O’Briain -- The Gentleman Comic
    Fear of Flying: My Morbid View of Airline ...
    The Growth of Medical Tourism in the UK
    Funny Boy
    Anger as Carlos Tevez Appears to Refuse to Play
    Shadow Chancellor Outlines Five-Point Plan for ...
    Broken Hearted: What Do You Say?
    President Obama Weighs-in to the Japanese ...
    The Beautiful Game: Memories of When My Team ...
    Shake It, Baby!
    Student Protestors Riot in London
    The Amityville Horror
    The Blitz
    British, US Soldiers to Do Marathon Run for ...
    Horse-trading with People’s Lives
    Is It the Future or Just a Fad?
    The Price of Failure
    You Know He Was British, Don’t You?
    The Drug Problem in United Kingdom
    Capitalism: How Free Does It Really Make Us?
    Rogue Afghan Soldier Kills 3 British Soldiers
    Blair’s Guards’ Expenses under Scrutiny
    Britain’s Hidden Disaster
    Referendum on Electoral Reform to be Announced
    The Mediterranean Diet
    Shame! England, My England!
    To Hell in a Handcart
    It’s Not Easy Being an England Fan
    Cumbrian Gunman Kills 12
    Rooney Is Greatest Player World Has Ever Seen
    Video Games: PC Vs. PS
    More Injury Woes for England
    England Team Banned from Using Twitter during ...
    Gareth Barry in Race to Prove Fitness
    Forgotten Couple Still in Hands of Somali ...
    England 3 – 1 Mexico
    England Captain, Ferdinand, Expresses Concern ...
    President Obama Looking for Spending Cuts
    British Airways Obtains an Injunction to ...
    Hedgehogs and Plumbers
    Britain Has a Hung Parliament
    Is It Being Destroyed by Too Much Money?
    Video Games: A Community Divided
    Video Games: They’ve Come a Long Way
    Gordon Brown Forced to Apologise over ...
    Why British Monarchy Is the Best in World
    How Many Wives Did Henry VIII Have?
    Annual Leave? I’d Rather Stay, If That"s All ...
    Plea of Bosnia-Herzegovina’s War Crime Victim
    The Family Way — Divorce
    UK Flights Grounded by Volcanic Ash
    Deadly Italian Train Crash Kills 6
    The Rise of Nationalism in Britain
    When America Sneezes the World Gets a Cold
    Oil Companies Continue to Rape Planet for ...
    Snow in Spring Brings Chaos to Parts of the UK
    Bureaucracy Strikes Again
    Darling Targets Election Victory with Safe ...
    The Child Bride Problem Is Still Alive and Well
    Terrified Emergency Call of a Woman Whose Car ...
    Achilles Tendon Injury Ends World Cup Dream
    Continuing Turbulence at British Airways
    Teenager's Murder Highlights Dangers of ...
    UK Election Juggernaut Begins to Roll
    War Families Anger at MoD Bonuses
    Cameron under Pressure over Lisbon Treaty
    Resignations Follow the Sacking of ...
    Benefits of the Mediterranean Diet
    Tony Blair Ready to Stand for EU Presidency ...
    Debates Continue as Queen Weighs in to Row ...
    Protests Greet Nick Griffin’s Appearance on ...
    21 Environment Protesters Arrested in England
    The British Government Passes the Buck Again
    Everything Must Go As British Government Sells ...
    Boyzone Star Stephen Gately Dies
    Is David Cameron Even Capable of Honest ...
    The Tragedy of "Heaven's" Child Brides
    Elite – The UK’s Higher Education System
    Why Can’t I Hate Barack Obama?
    The UNCRC – The Convention That Dare Not ...
    The Tragedy of Child Brides


Shane Clarke serves as London Correspondent for The Seoul Times. He has been involved in humanitarian work for numerous years. He’s also a freelance management consultant. Having completed an honors degree in Law at Wolverhampton University, he then moved on to an MBA at Warwick Business School. He’s heavily involved in the fight against international parental child abduction to Japan.

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange