Global Views
   Middle East & Africa
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 English Teaching
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
Trump's Tax Returns: Our Business?
Special Contribution
By Domenico Maceri
Donald Trump

"It's none of your business." That's how Donald Trump responded to George Stephanopoulos of ABC on the tax rate paid by the GOP presumptive nominee. Trump eventually agreed to release his tax returns once the IRS completes the current routine audits.

Trump's reluctance to release his tax returns is consistent with his changing positions. When Mitt Romney, the GOP standard-bearer in 2012, was reluctant to disclose his tax returns, Trump encouraged him to do so. It's another story now.

Releasing his tax returns would not help Trump as he did not aid Romney. Voters in 2012 found out that the rate paid by Romney was less than 20 percent, a lower figure than that paid by many middle-class Americans. It helped to paint Romney as a wealthy man unable to understand the problems of the average American.

Thus Trump's hesitation is understandable. In the case of the New York tycoon it's a more complicated affair. Starting with the fact that tax returns may confirm what many suspect to be the true measure of his wealth. Trump has repeatedly said he has more than 10 billion dollars. Releasing his tax returns would confirm it.

Or maybe not. According to the Wall Street Journal, he has more than a billion and a half but not necessarily his oft-mentioned 10 billion. In 2005, however, a reporter calculated his assets at about 250 million dollars. Trump, upset by the low figure, sued the journalist for libel but did not win the case.

Trump has cultivated the image of being so rich that no one can buy him, as is the case with other politicians. He has accepted very few contributions in the primary but also benefited from millions and millions of free media publicity.

As soon as he wants to go on TV or radio, the doors are always open because it helps with ratings. Radio and television are a business and money talks. Trump generates money for the media while at the same time receiving his benefits.

Having almost the nomination in his pocket, Trump has changed his mind on financial contributions and has decided to form a "world class" organization that will collect a billion and a half dollars needed for the campaign.

Trump will have to explain why he did not keep his promise of self-financing. Perhaps because he is not as rich as he tried to make us believe

The tax returns would put an end to the speculations made by some like Romney who suggested that there maybe a bombshell in Trump's fiscal situation. It is believed that Trump has paid a very low rate because he has repeated several times he fights "to pay as little in taxes as possible." In the 1970s in fact, he paid "0" taxes, according to documents contained in a report by a 1981 New Jersey gambling regulators.

According to the newspaper Crain's New York Business, Trump also benefited from a deduction for individuals with income below $500,000 in 2014, 2015 and 2016. This does not clarify the value of his assets but does not seem suggest the fabulous income of a billionaire?

There are also doubts that he has not shown the great generosity he claims with charitable organizations and that he may have had dealings with less-than-completely honest people. It is also believed that his contributions to the political right and left would cause big headaches for possible favors received. Releasing his tax returns would also shed light on his four bankruptcies?

It's better, therefore, to keep it a secret. But the problem is that since 1970 all of the presidential candidates of the two major parties have released their tax returns. Trump would be the first exception.

In 2012, when Romney was reluctant to release his tax returns, Barack Obama attacked him with ads, questioning the tax rate he may have paid. Eventually Romney relented and released his returns because of the political cost?

Hillary Clinton, Trump's likely opponent in November, will repeat these kinds of ads to force clarity on the finances of New York tycoon?

Trump told Stephanopoulos that voters would not learn anything from his tax returns. His loyal Republican voters who handed him the nomination will believe him. General election voters are more demanding. The president or potential president's tax returns are not only Trump's business but that of all Americans.

Related Articles
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning Hand ...
    World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field
    John Kelly's Fails English and History
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal
    Yesterday's Immigrants: Better Than Today's?
    Trump's Alternative Reality on Immigration: a ...
    Kaine's Español: Not Just Empty ...
    Immigration: The Supreme Court Hands GOP a ...
    Trump's Wall is Full of Holes
    Angry Latino Voters Will Deny Trump the ...
    Bilingualism and US Presidents
    Cruz: A "Canadian" for the US Presidency?
    Spanish in the US: Just an Immigrant Language?
    US Border Enforcement Bil Too Tough, Unwise
    Freedom of Speech in English Only?
    The GOP: No Guest Worker Program?
    Tancredo: the Ugly Face of the GOP?
    Rights for Illegal immigrants?
    Healthcare for All?
    No English, No Service?
    When Language Knowledge Means Security
    Enough Undocumented Workers?
    Bilingual Principals?
    Domestic Workers: Family Members?
    Mexico in US
    Tongue-Tied Bush?
    Is Immigration a Local Affair?
    Voting Rights in Español
    Profiting from Illegal Immigration?
    Job Safety for All?
    When English Only Discriminates
    Border Control with Songs?
    Guilty Parents, Innocent Children?
    Only One Language for America?
    George Bush: Already Lame Duck?
    A Comprehensive Immigration Bill That Works
    Language as Integration
    Driving in English Only?
    Illegal Workers Saving Social Security?
    Learning Languages the Easy Way?
    English-Only Laws: Why?
    Arnold Schwarzenegger: Pete Wilson II?
    Language Fluency Means Security
    Stingy Government But Generous People

Other Articles by Domenico Maceri
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning ...
    World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field
    John Kelly's Fails English and History

Domenico Maceri, Ph.D., UC Santa Barbara, teaches foreign languages at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria, CA. His articles have appeared in many newspapers including Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Japan Times, and The Seoul Times. Some of his stories won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.






The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange