Global Views
   Middle East & Africa
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 English Teaching
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
Kaine's Español: Not Just Empty Palabras
Special Contribution
By Domenico Maceri
Donald Trump with Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton

"I didn't have to get a translator at the Republican Convention." CNN political commentator and Donald Trump's supporter Scottie Nell Hughes downplayed with these words Tim Kaine's "Bienvenidos a todos" and other Spanish phrases in his appearance with Hillary Clinton at Florida International University.

Hughes conveniently forgot that at the GOP Convention Spanish was in fact used by Ralph Alvarado. The Kentucky state senator attacked Hillary Clinton and sang Trump's praise in both English and Spanish. He later explained that using Spanish is a "direct appeal to home" and that he knows what "culture is about."

Alvarado is right but he is in a party that does not value nor recognize Latinos and their needs which go far beyond language. Nevertheless language is an important issue and Kaine, who is fluent in Spanish, will be very valuable to Hillary Clinton in reaching out to Latinos.

Even using a limited Spanish can be beneficial in any situation. Just like the patient feels a bit better upon hearing the doctor saying a mere "buenos días", voters appreciate the fact that a politician addresses them in their language.

George W. Bush certainly understood it. Although he did not speak Spanish very well, he used it effectively in his 2000 and 2004 campaigns. Latino voters rewarded him at the polls. About 40% percent voted for him, an excellent result for a Republican candidate.

Of course, establishing a correlation between Bush's use of Spanish and his success with Latino voters would be misleading if one would exclude his moderate views on immigration, a very important issue at that time which continues to this day. John McCain, on the other hand, received only 31 percent of the Latino vote in 2008 and Mitt Romney in 2012 did even worse receiving only 27 percent. Language was not a big issue in these cases but their positions on immigration played a significant role.

In essence, language must be matched with political stands to be effective. The GOP's position on immigration, characterized by building walls and mass deportation, as Trump has advocated, would change little even if the New York tycoon spoke beautiful Spanish. Trump, in fact, has denigrated Jeb Bush early in the campaign for giving interviews in Spanish. Yet, Trump made a very awkward attempt to reach out to Latinos with a picture of him eating a taco bowl on Cinco de Mayo. That is of course classic pandering.

Kaine's use of language, though, is different since it's backed up by substance. The Democratic vice presidential candidate learned Spanish in Honduras as a Catholic missionary.

Thus, when he talks about family values shared by Latinos and Americans en español, it rings true and has a profound impact including Latinos who are totally integrated and may or may not speak Spanish.

Even Hispanics who may have lost their Spanish completely still feel an emotional link upon hearing the sound of their ancestors' language, viewing it as a valuable skill as well as a symbol of their culture.

It's inevitable that Kaine's linguistic knowledge will emerge in swing States where the increasing Latino vote can make a difference, particularly in Florida, Colorado, and Nevada.

However, even in traditional red States such as Arizona español would be beneficial as the rising Latino vote may make them competitive for Democrats.

Hillary Clinton has chosen Kane not because his linguistic abilities but rather his experience as governor, US senator, and his ability to step into the presidency if the need were to occur. Yet, his knowledge of Spanish is a definite plus.

Politicians will use any issue regardless of significance to gain advantages over their opponents. These include kissing babies or sampling ethnic cuisine. Some of it ends up being little more than pandering. Language is different. It may not be a fundamental issue for the brain since most Latino voters understand English. Yet, when backed up by substance, it can be a powerful tool to reach voters' hearts. Thus when Kaine addresses voters in Spanish it's not just empty palabras.

Related Articles
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning Hand ...
    World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field
    John Kelly's Fails English and History
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal
    Yesterday's Immigrants: Better Than Today's?
    Trump's Alternative Reality on Immigration: a ...
    Immigration: The Supreme Court Hands GOP a ...
    Trump's Tax Returns: Our Business?
    Trump's Wall is Full of Holes
    Angry Latino Voters Will Deny Trump the ...
    Bilingualism and US Presidents
    Cruz: A "Canadian" for the US Presidency?
    Spanish in the US: Just an Immigrant Language?
    US Border Enforcement Bil Too Tough, Unwise
    Freedom of Speech in English Only?
    The GOP: No Guest Worker Program?
    Tancredo: the Ugly Face of the GOP?
    Rights for Illegal immigrants?
    Healthcare for All?
    No English, No Service?
    When Language Knowledge Means Security
    Enough Undocumented Workers?
    Bilingual Principals?
    Domestic Workers: Family Members?
    Mexico in US
    Tongue-Tied Bush?
    Is Immigration a Local Affair?
    Voting Rights in Español
    Profiting from Illegal Immigration?
    Job Safety for All?
    When English Only Discriminates
    Border Control with Songs?
    Guilty Parents, Innocent Children?
    Only One Language for America?
    George Bush: Already Lame Duck?
    A Comprehensive Immigration Bill That Works
    Language as Integration
    Driving in English Only?
    Illegal Workers Saving Social Security?
    Learning Languages the Easy Way?
    English-Only Laws: Why?
    Arnold Schwarzenegger: Pete Wilson II?
    Language Fluency Means Security
    Stingy Government But Generous People

Other Articles by Domenico Maceri
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning ...
    World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field
    John Kelly's Fails English and History

Domenico Maceri, Ph.D., UC Santa Barbara, teaches foreign languages at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria, CA. His articles have appeared in many newspapers including Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Japan Times, and The Seoul Times. Some of his stories won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.






The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange