Global Views
   Middle East & Africa
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 English Teaching
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
Prof. Maceri's special column
World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field
Special Contribution
By Domenico Maceri
Diego Maradona's "Hand of God" Goal — Diego Maradona uses his hand to find a way past England goalkeeper Peter Shilton to score the infamous 'hand of god' goal
in front of 115,000 fans in in the quarter-final football match of the 1986 FIFA World Cup held between Argentina and England at the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City on June 22, 1986.

“The truth is that I don't regret for a second scoring that goal with my hand.” With these words revealed in 2005, Diego Maradona confirmed that he had used his hand to score a goal in a game between Argentina and England. The illegal action helped his national team advance to the semi-final stage and eventually win the World Cup in 1986.

Wounds of the Falkland War of 1982 between Argentina and Great Britain were still fresh in 1986 and the soccer game between the two countries took on a symbolic meaning. A few days before the game, a headline in an English paper stated very realistically “Si, Señor, It's War.” It was just a game, of course, but for the Argentines it certainly went far beyond sports. Winning became an opportunity to stick it to the English even through illegal means, although Maradona at the time credited the “hand of God,” for scoring the goal.

The final stages of this year's World Cup are being played in Russia and both England and Argentina are part of the 32 finalists. The two countries are in different groups but assuming that both will advance there is a chance they could meet again for a 1986 rematch.

It would not be the only game in which nationalistic feelings would emerge on the soccer field, as history tells us. When two countries meet in the World Cup it's not just a game since national pride is at stake that goes far beyond the soccer field. In 1966, when England beat Germany in the final game to win the World Cup, many English fans saw a repeat of their win in World War II. In 1988, when Holland defeated Germany in the European championship, delirious Dutch fans threw their bicycles up in the air and shouted that they had got their “bikes back,” a reference to World War II, when the Nazis had confiscated all the bikes in Holland.

In 1998 the Iranian national team beat the US counterpart in France. Iranians poured into Tehran streets to celebrate their victory. Neither team eventually won the World Cup but even beating an historical “enemy” in a single game made the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei state that the players had made their nation happy. It was a way of paying back the “Great Satan” for the American support of the Shah and Iraq during their war.

Many of the countries in the final 32 don't have much of a chance to win the World Cup. Yet, even advancing to the quarter finals and in exceptional cases the semi-final stage would be a great victory. In some cases, even beating one of the perennial candidates to the final victory, such as Brazil, Germany, Spain, France, Argentina, and a few others, is the equivalent to winning the final trophy.

Losing to a “small” country can also be a national disaster. In 1966, North Korean players became heroes in their country when they defeated their Italian counterparts. Italian players, on the other hand, were greeted back home by fans who threw lemons at them. A disaster Italian players repeated in this year's Cup in which they failed to qualify for the final stages.

Sadly, soccer fevers engenders enthusiasm in many countries which political leaders exploit for their purposes. Just winning a game against one of these rich countries suggests to a poor or small country, lacking a winning tradition in soccer, that although they may not equal the major soccer power-economically, politically, or in other ways, they can compete in one area. And for a moment they feel that they are better than the defeated country, not just in soccer, but in every other aspect of life. It's not true, of course, but soccer fever is very strong because it is the world sport, something Americans can only understand if we add the popularity of American football, baseball, baseball, and hockey. And the victory on the soccer field boosts the national ego. It's a beginning for positive change in their lives.

It's difficult to predict who will take home the World Cup trophy this year. One country, though, has already won. As the host country, Russia, will be the focus not only of significant media attention but of political legitimacy as well. Although the United States, the European Union, and a number of other countries imposed sanctions on Russia after it took control of Crimea in 2014, FIFA did not follow suit and retained it as the host country. Vladimir Putin, by hosting the games, already won.

The above writer, Domenico Maceri, PhD, is emeritus professor of romance languages at Allan Hancock College, Santa Maria, California. Some of his articles have won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.

Related Articles
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning Hand ...
    John Kelly's Fails English and History
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal
    Yesterday's Immigrants: Better Than Today's?
    Trump's Alternative Reality on Immigration: a ...
    Kaine's Español: Not Just Empty ...
    Immigration: The Supreme Court Hands GOP a ...
    Trump's Tax Returns: Our Business?
    Trump's Wall is Full of Holes
    Angry Latino Voters Will Deny Trump the ...
    Bilingualism and US Presidents
    Cruz: A "Canadian" for the US Presidency?
    Spanish in the US: Just an Immigrant Language?
    US Border Enforcement Bil Too Tough, Unwise
    Freedom of Speech in English Only?
    The GOP: No Guest Worker Program?
    Tancredo: the Ugly Face of the GOP?
    Rights for Illegal immigrants?
    Healthcare for All?
    No English, No Service?
    When Language Knowledge Means Security
    Enough Undocumented Workers?
    Bilingual Principals?
    Domestic Workers: Family Members?
    Mexico in US
    Tongue-Tied Bush?
    Is Immigration a Local Affair?
    Voting Rights in Español
    Profiting from Illegal Immigration?
    Job Safety for All?
    When English Only Discriminates
    Border Control with Songs?
    Guilty Parents, Innocent Children?
    Only One Language for America?
    George Bush: Already Lame Duck?
    A Comprehensive Immigration Bill That Works
    Language as Integration
    Driving in English Only?
    Illegal Workers Saving Social Security?
    Learning Languages the Easy Way?
    English-Only Laws: Why?
    Arnold Schwarzenegger: Pete Wilson II?
    Language Fluency Means Security
    Stingy Government But Generous People

Other Articles by Domenico Maceri
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning ...
    John Kelly's Fails English and History
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal

Domenico Maceri, Ph.D., UC Santa Barbara, teaches foreign languages at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria, CA. His articles have appeared in many newspapers including Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Japan Times, and The Seoul Times. Some of his stories won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.






The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange