News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  America
Biden's Iran Dilemma: Serve Obama's Third Term — or Trump's Second?
Special Contribution
By Thomas L. Knapp
US President Joe Biden
Even before winning the 2020 presidential election, Joe Biden began hedging his bets on US policy toward Iran. While correctly blaming Donald Trump for violating the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the Iran nuclear deal, he tried to fob responsibility for restoring that deal off on the Iranians rather than accepting the job himself.

"If Iran returns to strict compliance with the nuclear deal," he wrote in a September op-ed, "the United States would rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow-on negotiations." Since taking office, he and new US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken have held to that line.

Meanwhile the Iranian government has made it clear that since the US violated the deal first, and pressured other parties to it to violate it as well, the ball is in Biden's court, not theirs. The US can go back to keeping its word or continue breaking its promises. Biden's call ... and the clock is ticking.

"The time for the United States to come back to the nuclear agreement is not unlimited," Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tells CNN. "The United States has a limited window of opportunity ... The United States has to accept what we agreed upon."

If becoming president is like celebrating Christmas, Biden woke up to a lump of coal in his stocking from Donald Trump and a big, fat, pretty box under the tree from Barack Obama.

The Trump lump is the risk of being seen as "soft on Iran" if he returns to the deal without extracting further concessions from Tehran.

Obama's gift went under the tree in July of 2015 when he got the deal codified as a UN Security Council Resolution. The UN charter makes such resolutions binding on all member states. The US Senate duly ratified the UN charter as a treaty in 1945, making it, along with the Constitution, part of "the supreme law of the land."

It's not just true that Joe Biden CAN immediately and unilaterally return the US to compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. It's also true that, legally, he MUST do so.

Not that modern US presidents trouble themselves very much over adherence to the Constitution or the law, of course. It's still Biden's choice to make. And where Iran is concerned, that choice is pretty simple: Does President Joe Biden want to serve Barack Obama's third term, or Donald Trump's second?

Think fast, Joe.



Related Articles
    Powell Lied, People Died: Justice Delayed Was ...
    "No First Use": An Empty Gesture That Would ...
    Facebook Gives the Most Dangerous Extremists a ...
    Wuhan Lab Leak: It's Not a "Theory"
    About That "Rules-Based International Order"
    A Biden-Putin Summit: Jaw-Jaw is Better than ...
    Joe Biden Reaffirms Washington's Message to ...
    "Vaccine Passports" and the Holocaust: An ...
    Same as the Old Boss, Julian Assange Edition
    COVID-19: The Way the Music Died?
    How Joe Biden Can Score a Major Foreign Policy ...
    Trump Regime vs. the ICC: The Wrong Side of ...
    Stop Blaming Russia, China for US Disarmament ...
    NATO is a Brain Dead, Obsolete, Rabid Dog! ...
    North Korea Nuclear Freeze? Finally, a ...
    US War on Iran: Evil, Stupid, Self-Damaging
    US Should Stop Meddling in Spratly Dispute
    John Bolton Vs. International Criminal Court: ...
    Syria: Is Trump Finally Putting America First?
    Some Questions from the Edge of Immortality
    More Korean War Is "Worth It?" To Whom?
    A Korean Spring after the Winter Olympics Is ...
    Microsoft Corp. vs. United States: Jeff ...


The above writer, Thomas L. Knapp, (Twitter: @thomaslknapp), is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange