News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  America
Meditations
Fragmentation and Wholeness
By Martin LeFevre
Contributing Writer
A Neanderthal man some 100,000 years ago
In the West in the 19th century, anthropologists and philosophers called the human brain ¡°the pinnacle of creation.¡± With that brain however, humans are bringing much of life on earth to the brink of extinction. Not to mention the self-absorbed ¡°climate crisis¡± in the anthropocentric ¡°Anthropocene Age.¡±

The question ¡®where did man go wrong?¡¯ somewhat misses the mark. Man has been going wrong ever since the emergence of ¡°fully modern humans¡± about 100,000 years ago. It¡¯s just culminating in our age.

So it¡¯s essential to ask: How did humans evolve as a destructive planetary force, when life unfolds in seamless, dynamic order? That, to my mind, is one the most important questions a human being can ask.

This line of questioning doesn¡¯t grow out of misanthropy, but out of deep curiosity, and a love of life, humanity and philosophy. If one asks the right questions, and persists in asking them, the universe releases its secrets.

To even consider the question of where man went wrong, one has to have a clear perception and feeling for the wholeness of nature, and of the fragmentation of man.

If one views nature in terms of the categories, objects and elements that humans separate it into, then one can¡¯t perceive the unbroken order of the earth and the universe. And if one has fixed ideas about what it means to be human, one can¡¯t explore how humans came to be a contradiction in nature.

Chaos does not exist in nature or the universe, only in man and creatures like man, wherever they may temporarily exist in the universe. Given that nature and the cosmos are evolving in increasingly complex order in undivided wholeness, and that Homo sapiens inextricably evolved along with all life, how did humans come to be such a huge factor of fragmentation and disorder, to the planet, and to ourselves?

Some philosophers see man¡¯s increasing disorder, destructiveness and darkness as rooted in patriarchy, or in the Agricultural Revolution, in the Industrial Revolution or in colonialism. To my mind, these and other historical periods and patterns are secondary; the root cause of fragmentation and disorder is the evolution of symbolic thought.

The phrase ¡®higher thought¡¯ privileges man, and reveals a tendency to idolize the human adaptive pattern of symbolic thought, rather than understand its place, or lack of place in the natural order.

Since the cognitive threshold to fully modern humans was crossed about 100,000 years ago, the human brain and ¡®human nature¡¯ have remained essentially unchanged. Remove a Cro Magnon child from Asia or Europe and raise her in Seoul or San Francisco, and she would as readily adapt to either culture as any average child born today.

Bring a Homo sapiens child from 1000 years before the Cognitive Revolution however, and they would be seen as intellectually impaired.

It¡¯s worth reflecting on the fact that all other animals fit within and derive their living from adapting to a single ecological niche. Only humans evolved an adaptive pattern that enabled us to break the bonds of niche, amass knowledge of the resources around us, and live anywhere on earth.

That adaptation rests, at bottom, on the ability to intentionally remove parts of the environment from the whole, accrue knowledge about animals and plants, and exploit and recombine reified ¡®things¡¯ in as many ways as our minds can conceive and imagine.

This constellation of cognitive abilities is the source of both our success as a species, and our alienation from and destructiveness in nature. In one sense therefore, as I wrote in my last column, man did not go wrong, but evolution went wrong in us.

The human condition is much more complex and subtle than anyone can encompass of course. But one can gain insight into the broad strokes of where we went wrong, and thereby see the way out of man¡¯s quickening spiral of fragmentation and darkness.

This trajectory of human evolution is the opposite of that the Jesuit priest Teilhard de Chardin believed. Rather than an ascending spiral of evolution progressing to an imagined ¡°Omega point¡± (¡°the maximum level of complexity and consciousness towards which the universe is evolving¡±), the cycles of history have been accelerating in the other direction, generating an increasingly deep and global crisis, requiring an evolutionary leap to resolve.

In short, evolution produced a brain capable of consciously manipulating its environment, rather than living unconsciously within ecological niches as other animals do. The hardware (the increased gray matter and complexity of the human brain) that came with the evolution of symbolic thought gave us the capacity for self-awareness, but the dominant software of self-centeredness threatens to destroy everything.

Egocentricity (not just in the individualistic sense, but also as ¡®my family,¡¯ ¡®my religion,¡¯ ¡®my country¡¯) is not an inherent and immutable trait of human nature, as proponents of outdated notions of ¡°self-interest¡± insist. But it is a very strong tendency and ancient habit in all cultures, requiring radical change and psychological revolution.

In the final analysis, because thought is a separative mechanism into which we generally don¡¯t have insight, it is projected and idolized as the basic principle of the universe. Hence ¡®God¡¯ is often seen as perfect thought.

Humankind internalized separation as the ¡®me and mine,¡¯ and as ¡®us vs. them.¡¯ That is the ¡®original sin¡¯ and ongoing mistake that we now have no choice but to address at the root within ourselves.

In this understanding, darkness/evil doesn¡¯t have a supernatural basis, and doesn¡¯t require theological explanations. Rather, it is the inevitable, cumulative byproduct of the unwise use of symbolic thought.

Self-made fragmentation is decimating and deadening everything and everyone on earth. It is the unseen driving force behind the need for ¡°diversity¡± and to ¡°preserve my culture,¡± which is producing even more fragmentation.

However there¡¯s also the life force driving an increasing urgency and necessity of a conscious transmutation in the human brain, an evolutionary leap into self-knowing wholeness and true consciousness.



Related Articles
    Fluidity of Thought Is a Far Cry From ...
    Time Is Elastic, But Timelessness Is Fantastic
    Slaughter and War Spew from Time and Memory
    The Universe Is in a State of Meditation. Why ...
    Two Kinds of Metaphysical Movement?
    Resolve Contradictions, Revere Paradoxes
    The Human Brain Is Exapted for Insight
    Narratives or Insight?
    Oppenheimer, and ¡°I Am Become Death¡±
    Doing Philosophy In America
    Regarding Nihilism and Negation
    Providence, the End of Man, and the Emergence ...
    Awakening Intelligence Within
    Teilhard Got It Backwards
    Awakening a Proprioception of Thought
    Human Being Is Not a ¡°Very Small Phenomenon¡±
    Finding False Comfort In Impermanence
    Has the Retreat Industry Contributed to Human ...
    Letter to a Friend about Meditation
    A Birthday Wish from America for Humanity on ...
    Our View of Nature Is the Cornerstone of Our ...
    Three Kinds of Singularity
    An Explanation, Though It Won¡¯t Change the ...
    When Did Progressives Become Warmongers?
    AI¡¯s Quantum Leap Demands a Quantum Leap in ...
    The Ending of Psychological Thought
    Concerning Discernment and Difference
    Mystical Experiencing Is Our Birthright
    AI, AI, AI, or I, I, I?
    What Is Art, and an Artist?
    Canaries in the Coal Mines of Consciousness
    Cosmic Pointlessness or Infinite Immanence?
    Cardinal Errors
    Concerning Stagnancy, Demography and Vitality
    Mind, Brain and Consciousness
    The State of Insight
    The Religious and Scientific Mind
    Q Craziness and Unaddressed Evil
    Localism Increases Fragmentation of Earth
    Collapsing the Distinction Doesn¡¯t Resolve ...
    The Silence of Being
    Heightened Senses In Nature Opens the Door to ...
    The Inter-National Order Is Dead and Gone
    Polarization Isn¡¯t the Problem
    Enlightenment Isn¡¯t Personal
    Human Beings Can Meet This Moment
    Nagasaki and the Incorrigibility of Man
    There Is No Evolution of Consciousness
    Imagining ¡®Umwelts¡¯ Is Unnecessary
    Expansion or Negation of Self?
    Intelligent Life, Meditation and Transmutation
    The Source of Evil Is Not a Person or a Nation
    The Dialogue Buffet at the Death Café
    Higher Thought: Threshold and Impediment to ...
    Is Universality a Western Idea?
    What Is Your View of Human Nature?
    Defeating Evil Without Violence
    A Recipe For World War
    Beyond Thinking Machines
    There Is No Such Thing as "Personal ...
    Time Is a Tremendous Illusion
    Breakthrough Infection, or Inflection?
    Requiem for a Meditation Place
    Did Evolution Go Wrong With Man?
    The Urgent Indifference of Enlightenment
    Death Isn¡¯t After Life; It¡¯s Inseparable ...


Martin LeFevre, a contemplative, philosopher and writer in northern California, serves as a contributing writer for The Seoul Times. His "Meditations" explore and offer insights on spiritual, philosophical and political questions in the global society. LeFevre's philosophical thesis proposes a new theory of human nature. He welcomes dialogue. lefevremartin77@gmail.com

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange