Breakthrough Infection, or Inflection?
By Martin LeFevre
A reader wrote giving voice to a central concern of this column. “There is a spiritual evolutionary process taking place, but that process takes millions of years and our little bit of consciousness just can’t comprehend the enormity of it.” His mistaken use of the word ‘enormity’ (which means “extreme evil or moral offensiveness”) belies the optimism that he intended to convey. The reader’s premise is that “crises come and go and after each crisis there is a lift in human spiritual evolution.” To my mind, that’s wishful thinking, and a deeply inaccurate perception of the human condition and the present crisis. As I see it, the human crisis is coming to a head. The present “world chaos” isn’t, as the reader suggests, just another “dip in the very long road to enlightenment.” But how momentous is the present human crisis? It is complete — a crisis of human consciousness itself. Consciousness as we know it is only about 75,000 years old. Prior to the “Cognitive Revolution,” art was unknown, and stone technology slowly changed over hundreds of thousands of years. And speech, to the extent it existed at all, was crude and lacking in the diversity of tongues we know today. In short, culture as we know it didn’t exist.Genetic studies indicate the human population dwindled to just a few tens of thousands of people at most, though the cause of this “bottleneck” remains unknown. Apparently the pressures on this small population of early humans produced an explosive breakthrough in the human brain, a transmutation that yielded the cognitive capabilities that define us as human, which in turn formed the world as we know it, for better and worse. All nearly 8 billion people on earth are descended from that breakthrough group of people in Africa. In our age, the cumulative, self-made fragmentation from the cognitive capabilities that emerged about 70 millennia ago are putting tremendous pressure on the individual and human species to radically change, this time consciously rather than unconsciously.Can a breakthrough in the individual, and a revolution in consciousness that changes the basic course of humankind actually occur at this time? Without respect to technology and the evils of virtual reality and augmented reality, the new human being will be as different from devolving modern humans of the present day as modern humans were from the proto-humans 75,000 years ago. Now, as then, people will look the same, but be different. So what characterizes the new human being? Whereas separation and division are the hallmarks of modern humans since the Cognitive Revolution, awareness and insight will be the hallmarks of true human beings after the Insight Revolution. Even in human evolutionary terms, the time periods we’re talking about are brief, only a factor of 6 or 7 older than recorded history. And to the extent that our evolutionary history becomes an open book to us, time scales shrink even more. Combine that growth in our knowledge (a very different thing than non-accumulative self-knowing) with the pressures from global warming, the Sixth Extinction (being brought about by the planet’s only self-aware species), global pandemics and terrorism, as well as the dangers from rogue superpowers such as America, Russia and China, and the fault lines come into sharp relief. Clearly, humankind has a limited number of chances to change course, and this may well be the last one. No teacher, however illumined, has changed the basic course of humankind. Jesus clearly failed in his mission to fundamentally change the human heart, though of course the failure wasn’t his but that of his disciples and the people of his time. It appears only Siddhartha ignited a creative explosion, and that was regional, following his death. Besides, the era of “great teachers” is over. It represents lost opportunities for humankind to move in a new direction. Why do we have to presume that this is the last chance for humankind to change course? Because to think otherwise is to erroneously obtain solace in the comforting idea of time/gradualism, which is inimical to inner growth and radical change. The hardest thing to learn is that there is no ‘later.’ It’s always now or never. Without radical change in the individual, the future will be like today, only more so. When one feels the enormity of the crisis, that perception mitigates self-centered activity, and summons the energy to meet the enormous challenge posed to each and all of us in the present. A diagnosis is not a prognosis. Will enough human beings awaken to finally, ‘at the last trumpet,’ change the course of humankind? All we can do is fully awaken ourselves, with an eye to the whole and future of humanity. Martin LeFevre
|Human population on Earth
Dialogue and the Human Condition
The Mystery of Consciousness
Negative Learning from a Rattlesnake
Beyond the Hell of Paradise
Mystical Insight and Petrified Religions
Will AI Catalyze a Revolution in Consciousness?
There’s No Muddling Through This Terrible ...
Neuroscience and The Mind In Meditation
It’s the Zeitgeist Stupid
Experiencing the Silent Ground of Being
Christmas 2023: Crucifying Christ Again
The Interfaith and Multi-Faith Movement Is ...
Crooked Line From 9/11 to Israel’s War on Gaza
Cop28 and Man’s War On the Earth
Fluidity of Thought Is a Far Cry From ...
Time Is Elastic, But Timelessness Is Fantastic
Slaughter and War Spew from Time and Memory
The Universe Is in a State of Meditation. Why ...
Two Kinds of Metaphysical Movement?
Resolve Contradictions, Revere Paradoxes
The Human Brain Is Exapted for Insight
Narratives or Insight?
Oppenheimer, and “I Am Become Death”
Doing Philosophy In America
Regarding Nihilism and Negation
Providence, the End of Man, and the Emergence ...
Awakening Intelligence Within
Teilhard Got It Backwards
Awakening a Proprioception of Thought
Human Being Is Not a “Very Small Phenomenon”
Finding False Comfort In Impermanence
Has the Retreat Industry Contributed to Human ...
Letter to a Friend about Meditation
A Birthday Wish from America for Humanity on ...
Our View of Nature Is the Cornerstone of Our ...
Three Kinds of Singularity
An Explanation, Though It Won’t Change the ...
When Did Progressives Become Warmongers?
AI’s Quantum Leap Demands a Quantum Leap in ...
The Ending of Psychological Thought
Concerning Discernment and Difference
Mystical Experiencing Is Our Birthright
AI, AI, AI, or I, I, I?
What Is Art, and an Artist?
Canaries in the Coal Mines of Consciousness
Cosmic Pointlessness or Infinite Immanence?
Concerning Stagnancy, Demography and Vitality
Mind, Brain and Consciousness
The State of Insight
The Religious and Scientific Mind
Q Craziness and Unaddressed Evil
Localism Increases Fragmentation of Earth
Collapsing the Distinction Doesn’t Resolve ...
The Silence of Being
Heightened Senses In Nature Opens the Door to ...
The Inter-National Order Is Dead and Gone
Polarization Isn’t the Problem
Enlightenment Isn’t Personal
Human Beings Can Meet This Moment
Nagasaki and the Incorrigibility of Man
There Is No Evolution of Consciousness
Imagining ‘Umwelts’ Is Unnecessary
Expansion or Negation of Self?
Intelligent Life, Meditation and Transmutation
The Source of Evil Is Not a Person or a Nation
The Dialogue Buffet at the Death Café
Higher Thought: Threshold and Impediment to ...
Is Universality a Western Idea?
What Is Your View of Human Nature?
Defeating Evil Without Violence
A Recipe For World War
Beyond Thinking Machines
There Is No Such Thing as "Personal ...
Time Is a Tremendous Illusion
Requiem for a Meditation Place
Fragmentation and Wholeness
Did Evolution Go Wrong With Man?
The Urgent Indifference of Enlightenment
Death Isn’t After Life; It’s Inseparable ...
Martin LeFevre, a contemplative, philosopher and writer in northern California, serves as a contributing writer for The Seoul Times. His "Meditations" explore and offer insights on spiritual, philosophical and political questions in the global society. LeFevre's philosophical thesis proposes a new theory of human nature. He welcomes dialogue. firstname.lastname@example.org