News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  America
Meditations
Localism Increases Fragmentation of Earth
By Martin LeFevre
Contributing Writer
The current population on Earth is 7.98 billion as of October 2022, according to the most recent United Nations estimates.

Localism Increases the Fragmentation of the Earth


The latest philosophical fad among comfortable progressives is that we each, all 8 billion-and-counting of us, belong to a particular place. The focus on “community” however, is a reaction to the planetary ecological and socio-political crisis. Localism is a misleading half-truth that is contributing to the fragmentation of the Earth and humanity.

The scale of the ecological crisis, and the crisis of human consciousness that gave rise to and mirrors it, is overwhelming. So it’s understandable that people who still give a damn would react by trying to narrow their focus, believing that “the local issues are where our attention should go.”

However the cliché, “think globally and act locally” has become “think locally and act locally.” And when the entire Earth is dying at the hands of man, localism is the wrong prescription. Why?

Because progressives forget that the parts can never make the Earth or humanity whole. If we begin with the whole, we can integrate the parts; but if we begin with the parts, we’ll never see the whole.

People are straining for diversity as an endless tsunami of homogeneity breaks over us. Even poets speak of how we are “different collections of histories born of particularities of place.” Like all clever half-truths, conventional minds nod in agreement, or agree so automatically that no conscious agreement is necessary.

Inarguably, local issues require our attention. But when the local is put before the global out of fear of the scale of the crisis, people are caught in the same separative and specialized mentality that has produced the Sixth Extinction and the climate crisis.

There are three universal flaws in human nature. The first is the belief that our problems originate externally and must be dealt with externally, when in fact they originate internally and must first be understood internally.

This mistake is understandable evolutionarily, but inexcusable morally. For tens of thousands of years, long before the dawn of agriculture, anatomically and cognitively modern humans had to be focused outwardly, since the immediate needs for and threats to survival came from the wilderness. Once humans across the world began to settle down in cities however, internally generated psychological divisions gave rise to organized religion, and war.

The second universal trait of the human mind is the habit of putting the part before the whole. Specialization and individualism are the plagues of the modern mind (as well as their reactions — collectivism, control and collective thought), but thinking in terms of the particular and immediate is as old as the division of labor.

The third primal pattern is the identification with specific groups, also known as tribalism, which has waxed and waned over the centuries in various forms. It’s ascendant in the present world in the form of a resurgence and regurgence of nationalism.

Nationalism, whether from hideous people such as Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene leading the retrogressive Make American Great Again movement, or coldly calculating machines like Vladimir Putin with his Restore the Russian Empire idiocy, have brought the world to the brink of nuclear war, again.

Many progressives insist, against overwhelming historical and current evidence to the contrary, that human nature is good, and that it is a “myth that humans are, by nature, competitive, selfish, and autonomous.” That “has lead to a cascade of self-fulfilling prophecies,” these pollyannas insist, since “human nature is, by default, empathic, community oriented, generous and cooperative.”

That childish view goes hand in hand with the romanticization of indigenous people in recent years, and the futile attempt to place the indigenous way of life back at the center of humankind’s adaptive pattern. It neglects two truths. First, all people were once indigenous people. Some were warlike, some peaceful. Most lived in a rough balance with nature, but that didn’t prevent man from hunting the megafauna into extinction.

Colonization was the brutal clash between “civilized” Europeans, with their “guns, germs and steel,” and the still plentiful numbers of indigenous peoples in North and South America, Africa, and Australia and Aotearoa.

Second, we cannot go back to reclaim indigenous wisdom and live according to its precepts about the Earth. Not only is that impossible, with very few intact indigenous groups retaining their traditions in more than a ritualistic way, but the entire phenomenon of tradition belongs to history. Humanity must move beyond tradition. The way ahead is not back.

Though humans haven’t psychologically changed since the emergence of modern man 100,000 or more years ago, that doesn’t mean we have to either revert to myths about the goodness of human nature, or fantasize about returning to a time when people lived close to nature.

People all over the world are feeling overwhelmed by the planetary crisis. Though it goes against the grain of human nature, history and current thinking, we have the capacity, as human beings, to see, feel and respond to the world as it is and as a whole.

Precisely because it is a planetary crisis that arises from man’s consciousness and “human nature,” we have no choice but to address it as a whole first. Localism and the mentality of “my community” contribute to the fragmentation of the Earth and humanity.

Martin LeFevre



Related Articles
    AI’s Quantum Leap Demands a Quantum Leap in ...
    The Ending of Psychological Thought
    Concerning Discernment and Difference
    Mystical Experiencing Is Our Birthright
    AI, AI, AI, or I, I, I?
    What Is Art, and an Artist?
    Canaries in the Coal Mines of Consciousness
    Cosmic Pointlessness or Infinite Immanence?
    Cardinal Errors
    Concerning Stagnancy, Demography and Vitality
    Mind, Brain and Consciousness
    The State of Insight
    The Religious and Scientific Mind
    Q Craziness and Unaddressed Evil
    Collapsing the Distinction Doesn’t Resolve ...
    The Silence of Being
    Heightened Senses In Nature Opens the Door to ...
    The Inter-National Order Is Dead and Gone
    Polarization Isn’t the Problem
    Enlightenment Isn’t Personal
    Human Beings Can Meet This Moment
    Nagasaki and the Incorrigibility of Man
    There Is No Evolution of Consciousness
    Imagining ‘Umwelts’ Is Unnecessary
    Expansion or Negation of Self?
    Intelligent Life, Meditation and Transmutation
    The Source of Evil Is Not a Person or a Nation
    The Dialogue Buffet at the Death Café
    Higher Thought: Threshold and Impediment to ...
    Is Universality a Western Idea?
    What Is Your View of Human Nature?
    Defeating Evil Without Violence
    A Recipe For World War
    Beyond Thinking Machines
    There Is No Such Thing as "Personal ...
    Time Is a Tremendous Illusion
    Breakthrough Infection, or Inflection?
    Requiem for a Meditation Place
    Fragmentation and Wholeness
    Did Evolution Go Wrong With Man?
    The Urgent Indifference of Enlightenment
    Death Isn’t After Life; It’s Inseparable ...


Martin LeFevre, a contemplative, philosopher and writer in northern California, serves as a contributing writer for The Seoul Times. His "Meditations" explore and offer insights on spiritual, philosophical and political questions in the global society. LeFevre's philosophical thesis proposes a new theory of human nature. He welcomes dialogue. lefevremartin77@gmail.com

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange