Global Views
   Middle East & Africa
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 English Teaching
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
What Is Art, and an Artist?
By Martin LeFevre
Contributing Writer
Rainer Maria Rilke (1875-1926) was an Austrian poet and novelist.
“Art too is just a way of living, and however one lives, one can, without knowing, prepare for it.”

“Things aren't all so tangible and sayable as people would usually have us believe; most experiences are unsayable, they happen in a space that no word has ever entered.”


There’s a strong correlation between the beginnings of art in prehistoric times and the emergence of what anthropologists call “fully modern humans.” However just what is art, and what is an artist?

The cave paintings of animals at Lascaux in France are as exquisitely rendered as the portraits of the great masters during the Renaissance. We don’t know why the people of the Upper Paleolithic lovingly and skillfully drew horses, deer, aurochs, ibex and bison on cave walls, but the sensitivity with which they painted these and other animals reverberates in the heart of every artist today.

That attests to the truth that whatever human nature is, in all its creative and destructive aspects, it was fully formed when Cro Magnons encountered Neanderthals in Europe about 50,000 years ago. They were as fully human as we are.

Human consciousness has not evolved, and cannot evolve. In total attention to cumulative consciousness, one leaves its shallow, muddy stream and enters the limitless ocean.

To my mind, art facilitates the great transition, even though art is always done, in whatever form, for its own sake. Clearly, one doesn’t have to paint or sculpt to be an artist. Indeed, one has to be an artist inwardly before one can give expression to beauty in one’s life.

Borrowing a term from athletics, I walked on in my early 30’s as graduate student in philosophy at one of the few Continental Schools in America. I needed to prove to myself that I had the chops to make it in academia as a philosopher, and after a year, I had earned the respect of the professors in the large department.

So I was taken aback when my best friend in the department said to me one day, “I see you as an artist.” When I asked what he meant, my normally precise, very rational friend couldn’t give me a satisfying explanation. So I chalked it up to a lack of understanding of where I was coming from philosophically.

It wasn’t that I thought philosophers were superior to artists, but that I never considered myself an artist and wanted to be considered a philosopher. They were totally different vocations after all, weren’t they?

It took me a while to realize that while artists aren’t necessarily philosophers and don’t generally philosophize, true philosophers are artists in an essential way. How?

Artists don’t feel the need to explain themselves or their art, but philosophers do. So there’s a bit of a contradiction here. For me it’s resolved when words and concepts dissolve in the silence of the mind in meditation.

I feel art, in whatever form, is a relationship with the beauty of nature, which is within us when the mind is quiet. The essence of beauty goes beyond the line, form and color in nature. Beauty isn’t necessarily expressed as landscape paintings, or in any artistic production at all.

All human beings growing in insight are sensitively aware, drawing upon the senses of the body, the feelings of the heart, and the faculties of the mind. In that sense we can all be artists. Therefore art is in our relationships and work, and reflects intimations of that which cannot be tangibly expressed.

What is the relationship between symbolic thought and art? Let’s take this passage from a recent National Geographic article, “What were Neanderthals really like - and why did they go extinct?”

“A breakthrough was the discovery that Neanderthals may have been capable of symbolic thought. In 2018 researchers announced they’d discovered evidence of cave paintings from 65,000 years ago - the oldest artworks of their kind. But the abstract nature of this art continues to fuel debates among scientists about complex their mental capacities were.”

This strikes me as funny. Are there really scientists who think that the crude and childlike sketches and hand stencils that Neanderthals apparently drew demonstrate that they were capable of abstract art arising from “complex symbolic thought?”

Despite misguided attempts to blur the distinction between Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis, they were not our cognitive equals. That isn’t to say our species was morally superior to Neanderthals. We drove them out, killed them off, and occasionally interbred with them until they ceased to exist as a distinct species, much as colonizers around the world have done with indigenous peoples whenever they encountered them.

On one hand, the National Geographic passage displays a misunderstanding of what symbolic thought is, mistakenly attributing it only to the latest and sole surviving hominin species, Homo sapiens. On the other hand, the passage rightly links “complex mental capacities” with highly developed art.

Neanderthals appear to have had a primitive capability for art, just as their tools and hunting abilities attest to a rudimentary capability for symbolic thought. However the cave art of Cro Magnons - the Homo sapiens that encountered Neanderthals — foreshadows that of the Sistine Chapel, indicating the presence of fully modern humans, possessing and possessed by complex symbolic thought.

“Whatever their cognitive abilities, Neanderthals were ultimately doomed,” the National Geographic article concludes. They weren’t doomed by some natural event, but by Homo sapiens, we humans, who are now driving to extinction so many other species with which we are meant to be sharing the Earth.

The great paradox, and contradiction, is that our cognitive abilities, turning on complex symbolic thought (also known as ‘higher thought’) have both given us the capacity for the highest expressions of art, and led to the decimation of the Earth.

That means the consciousness arising from complex symbolic thought must be superseded by a consciousness that transcends thought if the human being is to grow, rather than shrink and become extinct as well.

Martin LeFevre

Related Articles
    Cop28 and Man’s War On the Earth
    Fluidity of Thought Is a Far Cry From ...
    Time Is Elastic, But Timelessness Is Fantastic
    Slaughter and War Spew from Time and Memory
    The Universe Is in a State of Meditation. Why ...
    Two Kinds of Metaphysical Movement?
    Resolve Contradictions, Revere Paradoxes
    The Human Brain Is Exapted for Insight
    Narratives or Insight?
    Oppenheimer, and “I Am Become Death”
    Doing Philosophy In America
    Regarding Nihilism and Negation
    Providence, the End of Man, and the Emergence ...
    Awakening Intelligence Within
    Teilhard Got It Backwards
    Awakening a Proprioception of Thought
    Human Being Is Not a “Very Small Phenomenon”
    Finding False Comfort In Impermanence
    Has the Retreat Industry Contributed to Human ...
    Letter to a Friend about Meditation
    A Birthday Wish from America for Humanity on ...
    Our View of Nature Is the Cornerstone of Our ...
    Three Kinds of Singularity
    An Explanation, Though It Won’t Change the ...
    When Did Progressives Become Warmongers?
    AI’s Quantum Leap Demands a Quantum Leap in ...
    The Ending of Psychological Thought
    Concerning Discernment and Difference
    Mystical Experiencing Is Our Birthright
    AI, AI, AI, or I, I, I?
    Canaries in the Coal Mines of Consciousness
    Cosmic Pointlessness or Infinite Immanence?
    Cardinal Errors
    Concerning Stagnancy, Demography and Vitality
    Mind, Brain and Consciousness
    The State of Insight
    The Religious and Scientific Mind
    Q Craziness and Unaddressed Evil
    Localism Increases Fragmentation of Earth
    Collapsing the Distinction Doesn’t Resolve ...
    The Silence of Being
    Heightened Senses In Nature Opens the Door to ...
    The Inter-National Order Is Dead and Gone
    Polarization Isn’t the Problem
    Enlightenment Isn’t Personal
    Human Beings Can Meet This Moment
    Nagasaki and the Incorrigibility of Man
    There Is No Evolution of Consciousness
    Imagining ‘Umwelts’ Is Unnecessary
    Expansion or Negation of Self?
    Intelligent Life, Meditation and Transmutation
    The Source of Evil Is Not a Person or a Nation
    The Dialogue Buffet at the Death Café
    Higher Thought: Threshold and Impediment to ...
    Is Universality a Western Idea?
    What Is Your View of Human Nature?
    Defeating Evil Without Violence
    A Recipe For World War
    Beyond Thinking Machines
    There Is No Such Thing as "Personal ...
    Time Is a Tremendous Illusion
    Breakthrough Infection, or Inflection?
    Requiem for a Meditation Place
    Fragmentation and Wholeness
    Did Evolution Go Wrong With Man?
    The Urgent Indifference of Enlightenment
    Death Isn’t After Life; It’s Inseparable ...

Martin LeFevre, a contemplative, philosopher and writer in northern California, serves as a contributing writer for The Seoul Times. His "Meditations" explore and offer insights on spiritual, philosophical and political questions in the global society. LeFevre's philosophical thesis proposes a new theory of human nature. He welcomes dialogue.






The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange