News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  America
Meditations
Providence, the End of Man, and the Emergence of Human Beings
By Martin LeFevre
Contributing Writer
New York Times op-ed columnist Ross Douthat

God, in the belief system of Christians, is conceived as a separate “Supreme Being” that created the universe, and occasionally intervenes in human life. Providence is the belief in the notion of the protective care and direction of this monotheistic deity.

Attesting to the truism that beginning with the wrong premise will lead you inevitably to the wrong conclusion, one of the proliferating number of New York Times religion writers proclaims: “Providentialism is basically inescapable once you posit a divinity who made the world and acts in history.”

Perhaps so, but why would anyone these dark days “posit a divinity who made the world and acts in history?” God must be one miserable Supreme Being if we’re made in his or her image.

There is no Father God, no separate Creator sitting apart from creation and occasionally intervening in human history. Such conceptions and projections are childish, and belong to the childhood of humankind.

But is there such a thing as “providence” at all? If so, providence clearly works in reverse, using the worst of man, such as war, to bring forth radical changes.

Yet even secular progressives follow the hackneyed scripts of monotheism and nationalism. Referring to wartime advances during World War in radar and anti-aircraft shells, not to mention the atomic bomb, Paul Krugman doubles down on his nationalistic, World War II mindset, declaring, “All of this was made possible not just by America’s economic might but also by its cultural and social openness.” It’s a hideous commentary on the human prospect, and a sad reflection of an archaic worldview by a leading American progressive.

On the other side of the political spectrum, how can Christians, who continue to believe that humans are made in “the image of God,” continue to support an extreme conduit of collective darkness, Donald Trump? If there were such a thing as providence, would it ‘permit’ the racist Donald Trump to be elected again in 2024?

If so, it will be because America has left immanent intelligence no choice. Facing the fact that Trump is no aberration in America, and not simply a Republican malignancy, as Krugman asserts ad nauseum, is essential to preventing Trump’s return with a vengeance.

Imagining that “the destruction of Hitler’s Germany was a true and righteous judgment of Almighty God,” as a Catholic NYT columnist intones, is spiritually satisfying but philosophically shallow. It’s totally unhelpful in explaining how humans under God’s Providence could have fallen into the present global ecological/psychological crisis.

Foolishly engaging with an online persona called “The Bronze Age Pervert,” Ross Douthat disses and dismisses his question: “If God’s judgment is loss in a war or at the hand of brutal persecutors, does this mean you think God judged Jesus to be bad and the Romans to be good?”

Glibly, Douthat replies that Christians “understand God’s judgment on Christ’s life and message in the light of his resurrection, not just his death on Calvary.” That simply whitewashes the question with another belief (in Jesus’ physical resurrection), which is what Christianity has been doing with the failure of Jesus’ mission for 2000 years.

Roman Catholicism, with which I was brainwashed in parochial school (compulsory Mass in Latin six days a week, five before school, as well as mortal-sin-if-you-miss Sundays), goes further. Douthat absurdly argues that the Roman emperor “Constantine’s conversion in the 4th century proclaims God’s favorable judgment, with St. Peter’s Basilica standing as a victory monument.”

Egad, how can any educated person, given the Church’s closeting and covering up pederasts and pedophiles, not to mention its history of power and corruption, believe such balderdash anymore?

All the historical frippery and Christian revanchism (2.6 billion Christians! Hundreds of thousands Woodstock-light World Youth Day young people in Portugal!) does not begin to address the essence of the question of providence.

It comes down to the question: Does the Intelligence that imbues the universe, with its miraculous expression in the multitude of life on this little marble, care in a non-anthropocentric sense about the fate of creatures that evolved brains complex enough to have direct awareness of it?

Clearly not in any progressive way, even in the conservative believer’s strangely progressive interpretation. Man, the rapacious primate that has fragmented the Earth and himself to the breaking point, has come to its logical, illogical end.

Perhaps Homo sapiens could have changed course if people of his time had truly listened to Jesus, or a dozen other great teachers. (To make Jesus singularly special as the one and only “Son of God” is its own kind of blasphemy).

But we didn’t, and now we’re staring into the abyss, while debating how many of God’s warriors danced on the historical pin of the Thirty Years’ War.

Therefore providence, if it exists, works in reverse, giving us chance after chance to change course before the present singularity, the sum of all human darkness. True faith in humanity and providence (and mine has been shaky of late) trusts that human beings will hear the last trumpet.

Martin LeFevre



Related Articles
    Dialogue and the Human Condition
    The Mystery of Consciousness
    Negative Learning from a Rattlesnake
    Beyond the Hell of Paradise
    Mystical Insight and Petrified Religions
    Will AI Catalyze a Revolution in Consciousness?
    There’s No Muddling Through This Terrible ...
    Neuroscience and The Mind In Meditation
    It’s the Zeitgeist Stupid
    Experiencing the Silent Ground of Being
    Christmas 2023: Crucifying Christ Again
    The Interfaith and Multi-Faith Movement Is ...
    Crooked Line From 9/11 to Israel’s War on Gaza
    Cop28 and Man’s War On the Earth
    Fluidity of Thought Is a Far Cry From ...
    Time Is Elastic, But Timelessness Is Fantastic
    Slaughter and War Spew from Time and Memory
    The Universe Is in a State of Meditation. Why ...
    Two Kinds of Metaphysical Movement?
    Resolve Contradictions, Revere Paradoxes
    The Human Brain Is Exapted for Insight
    Narratives or Insight?
    Oppenheimer, and “I Am Become Death”
    Doing Philosophy In America
    Regarding Nihilism and Negation
    Awakening Intelligence Within
    Teilhard Got It Backwards
    Awakening a Proprioception of Thought
    Human Being Is Not a “Very Small Phenomenon”
    Finding False Comfort In Impermanence
    Has the Retreat Industry Contributed to Human ...
    Letter to a Friend about Meditation
    A Birthday Wish from America for Humanity on ...
    Our View of Nature Is the Cornerstone of Our ...
    Three Kinds of Singularity
    An Explanation, Though It Won’t Change the ...
    When Did Progressives Become Warmongers?
    AI’s Quantum Leap Demands a Quantum Leap in ...
    The Ending of Psychological Thought
    Concerning Discernment and Difference
    Mystical Experiencing Is Our Birthright
    AI, AI, AI, or I, I, I?
    What Is Art, and an Artist?
    Canaries in the Coal Mines of Consciousness
    Cosmic Pointlessness or Infinite Immanence?
    Cardinal Errors
    Concerning Stagnancy, Demography and Vitality
    Mind, Brain and Consciousness
    The State of Insight
    The Religious and Scientific Mind
    Q Craziness and Unaddressed Evil
    Localism Increases Fragmentation of Earth
    Collapsing the Distinction Doesn’t Resolve ...
    The Silence of Being
    Heightened Senses In Nature Opens the Door to ...
    The Inter-National Order Is Dead and Gone
    Polarization Isn’t the Problem
    Enlightenment Isn’t Personal
    Human Beings Can Meet This Moment
    Nagasaki and the Incorrigibility of Man
    There Is No Evolution of Consciousness
    Imagining ‘Umwelts’ Is Unnecessary
    Expansion or Negation of Self?
    Intelligent Life, Meditation and Transmutation
    The Source of Evil Is Not a Person or a Nation
    The Dialogue Buffet at the Death Café
    Higher Thought: Threshold and Impediment to ...
    Is Universality a Western Idea?
    What Is Your View of Human Nature?
    Defeating Evil Without Violence
    A Recipe For World War
    Beyond Thinking Machines
    There Is No Such Thing as "Personal ...
    Time Is a Tremendous Illusion
    Breakthrough Infection, or Inflection?
    Requiem for a Meditation Place
    Fragmentation and Wholeness
    Did Evolution Go Wrong With Man?
    The Urgent Indifference of Enlightenment
    Death Isn’t After Life; It’s Inseparable ...


Martin LeFevre, a contemplative, philosopher and writer in northern California, serves as a contributing writer for The Seoul Times. His "Meditations" explore and offer insights on spiritual, philosophical and political questions in the global society. LeFevre's philosophical thesis proposes a new theory of human nature. He welcomes dialogue. lefevremartin77@gmail.com

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange