News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  America
Meditations
Oppenheimer, and “I Am Become Death”
By Martin LeFevre
Contributing Writer
Cillian Murphy stars as J. Robert Oppenheimer in Christopher Nolan's new film "Oppenheimer."

I waited to see “Oppenheimer” until after the “Barbenheimer” foolishness flamed out, the theaters were nearly empty again, and the tickets were a fifth of the original price.

Christopher Nolan’s “Oppenheimer” runs together and runs long. The acting is superb however, and the film has spectacular moments, such when “the gadget” is detonated, and the exchange between Oppie and Einstein at the end.

Though three hours is a long time to sit through a movie, it was a pleasant experience, beginning with the friendly, 20-something employees at the theatre. When the young man at the ticket counter was asked if there were assigned seats, he said, “Technically yes, but if you can’t sit wherever you like, I’m going to buy a lottery ticket.”

The film itself was filled with that kind of droll humor uttered by highly intellectual people, though it shaded into gallows humor just before Trinity’s big test. The eggheads determined that the chances were very low that the atom bomb’s test in the desert at Los Alamos would ignite a chain reaction in the atmosphere that would completely destroy the world. Even so, one of the scientists took bets.

It didn’t happen of course, though the movie implicitly makes the case that it metaphorically did, and we’re just living in limbo until all the nuclear bombs of man are used and the world is destroyed.

The Trinity bomb, as tiny as it was compared to Edward Teller’s hydrogen bombs after World War II, was much more powerful than the theoretical physicists had predicted. So was the devastation and suffering unleashed on the civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

But the psychological shock of two bombs completely destroying two Japanese cities didn’t change anything, as Oppenheimer hoped it would. Man’s penchant for more and more destructive weapons of war remains unquenched.

The apocalyptic calculation that the Trinity test might ignite the earth’s atmosphere is the axis around which the film turns. Indeed, man’s destructiveness is behind the climactic scenes (literally as well as metaphorically), epitomized by Oppenheimer’s self-reported reaction to the Trinity test, taken from the Bhagavadgita: “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”

In the context of the film, the line is at once the personal moral indictment Oppenheimer felt after the bombs were used on a prostrate Japan; an indictment of the egomaniacal Truman and an unfeeling America; and finally an indictment of man as a whole.

The “I am become Death” line from the Bhagavadgita is much more philosophically subtle than it would appear however. In the literal translation of the Gita verse, death means “world destroying time.” In other words, time is “the great destroyer of worlds.”

There is tremendous truth in that, though not time by the clock or even the purported “arrow of time.” To end time in the psychological and world destroying sense within oneself, one has to awaken insight at great depth.

As Stephen Thompson, who has spent over 30 years studying and teaching Sanskrit says, “The fourth argument in the Gita is really that death is an illusion, that we’re not born and we don’t die. That’s the philosophy, really. That there’s only one consciousness and that the whole of creation is a wonderful play.”

People could afford to comfort themselves with ideas of such complete detachment when the myth was written of Arjuna the soldier arguing with the god Lord Krishna before an earthly battle. But the true illusion is that the complete detachment that Lord Krishna insists Arjuna attain is only possible after death. And then only if the maxim, “reincarnation is a fact, but not the truth” is valid.

In other words, the gods, if they exist, may remain indifferent to humankind’s fate. But living human beings must care about what will happen if nuclear weapons are used again, or we are inwardly dead (which is a fate far worse than physical death).

Death is the one thing that is not an illusion. Nor is war, and the testing and threat of nuclear weapons.

Though I have my doubts about Oppenheimer (the man and the movie), I concur with the meaning Oppie apparently gave and director Nolan definitely gave to “I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”

Which is, man has become the destroyer of worlds. That fact, in 2023, is undeniable. Our lifespans are limited; why doesn’t that impart urgency and responsibility to our lives?

Buddhism and the Bhagavadgita offer no insight into how the evolutionary development of conscious symbolic thought, which gave humans the capacity for direct perception and reception of immanence, is also the greatest impediment to realizing our spiritual potential.

However as the ecological, psychological, social and spiritual crisis of man intensifies by the week it has become essential to understand how man could have the power to bring about the Sixth Extinction. And that’s if we avoid nuclear annihilation.

The old faith in the Trinity, and the fatalism unleashed after scientific man’s Trinity, offer no insight and don’t light the way ahead. But insight is still available to us if we ask the right questions, and persist in asking them alone and together until insight ignites.

Martin LeFevre



Related Articles
    Fluidity of Thought Is a Far Cry From ...
    Time Is Elastic, But Timelessness Is Fantastic
    Slaughter and War Spew from Time and Memory
    The Universe Is in a State of Meditation. Why ...
    Two Kinds of Metaphysical Movement?
    Resolve Contradictions, Revere Paradoxes
    The Human Brain Is Exapted for Insight
    Narratives or Insight?
    Doing Philosophy In America
    Regarding Nihilism and Negation
    Providence, the End of Man, and the Emergence ...
    Awakening Intelligence Within
    Teilhard Got It Backwards
    Awakening a Proprioception of Thought
    Human Being Is Not a “Very Small Phenomenon”
    Finding False Comfort In Impermanence
    Has the Retreat Industry Contributed to Human ...
    Letter to a Friend about Meditation
    A Birthday Wish from America for Humanity on ...
    Our View of Nature Is the Cornerstone of Our ...
    Three Kinds of Singularity
    An Explanation, Though It Won’t Change the ...
    When Did Progressives Become Warmongers?
    AI’s Quantum Leap Demands a Quantum Leap in ...
    The Ending of Psychological Thought
    Concerning Discernment and Difference
    Mystical Experiencing Is Our Birthright
    AI, AI, AI, or I, I, I?
    What Is Art, and an Artist?
    Canaries in the Coal Mines of Consciousness
    Cosmic Pointlessness or Infinite Immanence?
    Cardinal Errors
    Concerning Stagnancy, Demography and Vitality
    Mind, Brain and Consciousness
    The State of Insight
    The Religious and Scientific Mind
    Q Craziness and Unaddressed Evil
    Localism Increases Fragmentation of Earth
    Collapsing the Distinction Doesn’t Resolve ...
    The Silence of Being
    Heightened Senses In Nature Opens the Door to ...
    The Inter-National Order Is Dead and Gone
    Polarization Isn’t the Problem
    Enlightenment Isn’t Personal
    Human Beings Can Meet This Moment
    Nagasaki and the Incorrigibility of Man
    There Is No Evolution of Consciousness
    Imagining ‘Umwelts’ Is Unnecessary
    Expansion or Negation of Self?
    Intelligent Life, Meditation and Transmutation
    The Source of Evil Is Not a Person or a Nation
    The Dialogue Buffet at the Death Café
    Higher Thought: Threshold and Impediment to ...
    Is Universality a Western Idea?
    What Is Your View of Human Nature?
    Defeating Evil Without Violence
    A Recipe For World War
    Beyond Thinking Machines
    There Is No Such Thing as "Personal ...
    Time Is a Tremendous Illusion
    Breakthrough Infection, or Inflection?
    Requiem for a Meditation Place
    Fragmentation and Wholeness
    Did Evolution Go Wrong With Man?
    The Urgent Indifference of Enlightenment
    Death Isn’t After Life; It’s Inseparable ...


Martin LeFevre, a contemplative, philosopher and writer in northern California, serves as a contributing writer for The Seoul Times. His "Meditations" explore and offer insights on spiritual, philosophical and political questions in the global society. LeFevre's philosophical thesis proposes a new theory of human nature. He welcomes dialogue. lefevremartin77@gmail.com

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange