Global Views
   Middle East & Africa
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 English Teaching
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
The Universe Is in a State of Meditation. Why Aren’t Human Beings?
By Martin LeFevre
Contributing Writer
Investigating how the brain produces consciousness is what philosophers call “the hard problem of consciousness.”

The potential in the human brain for higher states of awareness is awakened with the realization that consciousness is not extrinsic but intrinsic to nature and the cosmos.

Given that’s true however, what is the relationship between the consciousness that permeates nature and the universe, and the emergent, separative and fragmenting consciousness that has become so problematic in man?

Of course, to the dogmatically materialistic or scientific mind, much less to those who have settled on nihilism, there is no mystery, and so-called mystical experience is dismissed out of hand.

But the serious human being understands that while “man is the measure of all things,” there are realities beyond measurement. Questions beckon.

At the risk of invoking old teleological ideas, it’s clear that the universe is imbued with an intrinsic intent to evolve, through random means, brains with the capacity for silently participating in cosmic awareness. Not by a separate God standing apart from the universe, but by an inseparable intelligence.

As mystics across time, cultures and religious traditions attest, the human brain has evolved the capacity for cosmic consciousness on this multicolored mote in the vastness of space. Then why is realization of higher awareness so difficult, and rare?

The “perennial teachings’’ of the great religious teachers offer no insight into that conundrum as far as I know. Their concern was with spiritual awakening and realization of the individual, not philosophical inquiry and explanation. Inquiry and explanation have their place however.

Think on the noise of symbolic thought in contrast (not in comparison or competition) with the silence of true meditation. Such an inquiry has to be complemented by a true inner life, to which one gives daily priority.

When the philosophical investigation of consciousness, which is essentially intellectual, takes precedence over a daily meditative/contemplative practice, it leads to circular, if not absurd results. That’s what resulted from a workshop on panpsychism of academic philosophers in Poughkeepsie New York.

Panpsychism is the idea that “consciousness is a fundamental aspect of reality, like mass or electrical charge.” As reported in Scientific American, “in a small lecture hall with floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking the Hudson River, roughly two dozen scholars probed the possibility that perhaps it’s consciousness all the way down.”

That is opposed to the traditional and dominant idea that consciousness is an emergent phenomenon in the human brain. Investigating how the brain produces consciousness is what philosophers call “the hard problem of consciousness,” which is also the holy grail of neuroscientists.

These things got downright silly at the workshop, epitomized by this quote from Scientific American: “Take the question of whether fish feel pain. Traditional science can only study a fish’s outward behavior, not its mental state.”

“To Phillip Goff [the main proponent of panpsychism at the workshop], focusing on the fish’s behavior is not only wrong-headed but “horrific” because it leaves out what’s actually most important—what the fish actually feels. “We’re going to stop asking if fish are conscious and just look at their behavior? Who gives a shit about the behavior? I want to know if it has an inner life; that’s all that matters!”

The inner life of fish! Given this is what passes for philosophy in America, is it any wonder the socio-political culture is in such dire straits? In such a culture, meditation, by whatever name, becomes essential.

“Meditation without a cause or reason, without end or purpose is an incredible phenomenon…there is great beauty in meditation, not the beauty of things that have been put together by man or by nature, but of silence. This silence is emptiness, in which and from which all things flow and have their being.”

Between and beyond the words, this is what the ‘practice’ of meditation means to me. As each day is different, true meditation requires an approach that allows newness to be, which keeps the brain young and able to receive immanence.

So how did the emergent consciousness of symbolic thought, which gave the human brain the neural capacity for higher awareness, become a tremendous impediment to intrinsic consciousness, which permeates nature and the universe?

That’s the real mystery. All I’m sure of is that thought has to fall completely silent in passive awareness gathering non-directed attention for the human brain to have direct contact and communion with cosmic consciousness.

Martin LeFevre

Related Articles
    Dialogue and the Human Condition
    The Mystery of Consciousness
    Negative Learning from a Rattlesnake
    Beyond the Hell of Paradise
    Mystical Insight and Petrified Religions
    Will AI Catalyze a Revolution in Consciousness?
    There’s No Muddling Through This Terrible ...
    Neuroscience and The Mind In Meditation
    It’s the Zeitgeist Stupid
    Experiencing the Silent Ground of Being
    Christmas 2023: Crucifying Christ Again
    The Interfaith and Multi-Faith Movement Is ...
    Crooked Line From 9/11 to Israel’s War on Gaza
    Cop28 and Man’s War On the Earth
    Fluidity of Thought Is a Far Cry From ...
    Time Is Elastic, But Timelessness Is Fantastic
    Slaughter and War Spew from Time and Memory
    Two Kinds of Metaphysical Movement?
    Resolve Contradictions, Revere Paradoxes
    The Human Brain Is Exapted for Insight
    Narratives or Insight?
    Oppenheimer, and “I Am Become Death”
    Doing Philosophy In America
    Regarding Nihilism and Negation
    Providence, the End of Man, and the Emergence ...
    Awakening Intelligence Within
    Teilhard Got It Backwards
    Awakening a Proprioception of Thought
    Human Being Is Not a “Very Small Phenomenon”
    Finding False Comfort In Impermanence
    Has the Retreat Industry Contributed to Human ...
    Letter to a Friend about Meditation
    A Birthday Wish from America for Humanity on ...
    Our View of Nature Is the Cornerstone of Our ...
    Three Kinds of Singularity
    An Explanation, Though It Won’t Change the ...
    When Did Progressives Become Warmongers?
    AI’s Quantum Leap Demands a Quantum Leap in ...
    The Ending of Psychological Thought
    Concerning Discernment and Difference
    Mystical Experiencing Is Our Birthright
    AI, AI, AI, or I, I, I?
    What Is Art, and an Artist?
    Canaries in the Coal Mines of Consciousness
    Cosmic Pointlessness or Infinite Immanence?
    Cardinal Errors
    Concerning Stagnancy, Demography and Vitality
    Mind, Brain and Consciousness
    The State of Insight
    The Religious and Scientific Mind
    Q Craziness and Unaddressed Evil
    Localism Increases Fragmentation of Earth
    Collapsing the Distinction Doesn’t Resolve ...
    The Silence of Being
    Heightened Senses In Nature Opens the Door to ...
    The Inter-National Order Is Dead and Gone
    Polarization Isn’t the Problem
    Enlightenment Isn’t Personal
    Human Beings Can Meet This Moment
    Nagasaki and the Incorrigibility of Man
    There Is No Evolution of Consciousness
    Imagining ‘Umwelts’ Is Unnecessary
    Expansion or Negation of Self?
    Intelligent Life, Meditation and Transmutation
    The Source of Evil Is Not a Person or a Nation
    The Dialogue Buffet at the Death Café
    Higher Thought: Threshold and Impediment to ...
    Is Universality a Western Idea?
    What Is Your View of Human Nature?
    Defeating Evil Without Violence
    A Recipe For World War
    Beyond Thinking Machines
    There Is No Such Thing as "Personal ...
    Time Is a Tremendous Illusion
    Breakthrough Infection, or Inflection?
    Requiem for a Meditation Place
    Fragmentation and Wholeness
    Did Evolution Go Wrong With Man?
    The Urgent Indifference of Enlightenment
    Death Isn’t After Life; It’s Inseparable ...

Martin LeFevre, a contemplative, philosopher and writer in northern California, serves as a contributing writer for The Seoul Times. His "Meditations" explore and offer insights on spiritual, philosophical and political questions in the global society. LeFevre's philosophical thesis proposes a new theory of human nature. He welcomes dialogue.






The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange