Global Views
   Middle East & Africa
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 English Teaching
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
Prof. Maceri's column
English-Only Laws: Why?
Special Contribution
By Domenico Maceri
Social workers work with Hispanic children in a Hispanic community in the US.

Twenty-eight American states have declared English their official language. The last one was West Virginia which did so when the state legislature added the change in a flurry of other bills. House Judiciary Chairman Jon Amores was disappointed because the bill was "snuck " in and some legislators were not even aware of it.

Amores should not be concerned about the effect of the new English-only law. No change has occurred in the other states that have added the provision.

Language laws in the US have been adopted primarily as a response to rising immigration. The goal is to maintain the US as an English-speaking country.

A closely related phenomenon to English-only laws have been the voter-driven initiatives which have virtually eliminated bilingual education and imposed English-only instruction in California, Arizona, and Massachusetts. Both English-only laws and the anti-bilingual education movement aim to force immigrants to learn English and not expect services in foreign languages.

English-only laws are unnecessary because immigrants know extremely well the importance and power of the English language. English is the key to becoming doctors, engineers, lawyers, or college professors. Immigrants flock to English as a Second Language classes because they are keenly aware that this new skill will enable them to leave menial work behind them and become part of the American social and political system.

Although English-only laws have virtually no practical impact, they create some damage at the symbolic level. They represent a slap in face to Native Americans who have lost their land to European immigrants and whose languages are fast dying.

Various images of Hispanic people in the US

English-only laws are also a slap in the face to immigrants since they devalue the languages brought in by newcomers.

Aside from their symbolic meaning, English-only laws in the US have had some minor effects in the workplace, where Hispanics have sued their companies for forcing them to speak English on their break. Companies that adopted English-only laws in the workplace did it because of security or business reasons, yet in some cases they were instigated by linguistic prejudice.

Legislating what language people must use is futile. The Irish, who see themselves as having been colonized and oppressed by the English for eight centuries, have two official languages—English and Gaelic. Yet, although 30 percnet of the Irish population claims to know Gaelic, the language of "patriots," its use is limited. English, the language of "traitors and informants," dominates.

The Irish would have loved to rid themselves of the English language, the last vestige of English imperialism and oppression. They did not do so because it's a very practical and powerful language that helps the country's economy. In essence, the Irish bowed to the power and practicality of the English language.

A number of other countries have also bowed to the power of the English language around the globe including some former British colonies. Indeed English is a national or a very important language in about fifty countries around the world. It is also spoken as a second language by significant numbers of people. English has become the international language and will remain so for the foreseeable future.

The power of the English language in the US is so strong that laws defending it amount to nothing more than trying to kill a dead horse.

In a broad sense English-only laws reflect xenophobic attitudes and narrow-mindedness about global affairs, which require linguistic skills that go far beyond English only.

Everyone would agree that the English language is an indispensable tool in the US and abroad. However, while knowing English will get you far, a second language will get you further still. More than 53 percent of Europeans know at least two languages compared to 9 percent of Americans. Rather than declaring English the official language, how about laws to encourage Americans to learn a second language?

Related Articles
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning Hand ...
    World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field
    John Kelly's Fails English and History
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal
    Yesterday's Immigrants: Better Than Today's?
    Trump's Alternative Reality on Immigration: a ...
    Kaine's Español: Not Just Empty ...
    Immigration: The Supreme Court Hands GOP a ...
    Trump's Tax Returns: Our Business?
    Trump's Wall is Full of Holes
    Angry Latino Voters Will Deny Trump the ...
    Bilingualism and US Presidents
    Cruz: A "Canadian" for the US Presidency?
    Spanish in the US: Just an Immigrant Language?
    US Border Enforcement Bil Too Tough, Unwise
    Freedom of Speech in English Only?
    The GOP: No Guest Worker Program?
    Tancredo: the Ugly Face of the GOP?
    Rights for Illegal immigrants?
    Healthcare for All?
    No English, No Service?
    When Language Knowledge Means Security
    Enough Undocumented Workers?
    Bilingual Principals?
    Domestic Workers: Family Members?
    Mexico in US
    Tongue-Tied Bush?
    Is Immigration a Local Affair?
    Voting Rights in Español
    Profiting from Illegal Immigration?
    Job Safety for All?
    When English Only Discriminates
    Border Control with Songs?
    Guilty Parents, Innocent Children?
    Only One Language for America?
    George Bush: Already Lame Duck?
    A Comprehensive Immigration Bill That Works
    Language as Integration
    Driving in English Only?
    Illegal Workers Saving Social Security?
    Learning Languages the Easy Way?
    Arnold Schwarzenegger: Pete Wilson II?
    Language Fluency Means Security
    Stingy Government But Generous People

Other Articles by Domenico Maceri
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning ...
    World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field
    John Kelly's Fails English and History

Domenico Maceri, Ph.D., UC Santa Barbara, teaches foreign languages at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria, CA. His articles have appeared in many newspapers including Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Japan Times, and The Seoul Times. Some of his stories won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.





  Other Articles by Domenico Maceri
    Immigration: Roberts' Emotion about DACA ...
    Julián Castro's Monolingualism: a ...
    Biden's Immigration Plan: Between Trump and ...
    Legal and Illegal Immigration: A Winning ...
    World Cup: Beyond the Soccer Field

The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Publisher & Editor: Joseph Joh
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange