Global Views
   Middle East & Africa
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 English Teaching
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
Paul Kennedy Warns
"Degeneration of War Right Before Our Eyes"
Special Contribution
By Paul Kennedy
There are at least two types of degeneration — or, if you like, deterioration — in wartime. The first relates to the sheer physical increase in the lethality of the weapons used, leading to many more battlefield casualties than expected. Think of the impact of the machine gun and barbed wire upon the Battle of the Somme (1916), where the British Army suffered 60,000 dead and wounded on the first day of assaults.

Lethality could also strike on the home front. Think of the evolution of strategic bombing in World War II, where the load of munitions dropped in 1939-40 by the Germans was small compared with that in 1945 by the Allies. This is degeneration by body-count.

But the second form of degeneration in war is even more disturbing. It concerns the lowering of standards, the disregard of the Hague and Geneva conventions, the mistreatment of prisoners and civilians, the forced expulsion of peoples, the mass slaughter of ethnic and religious groups. The history of the bloody 20th century is replete with examples of all of the above.

I wonder sadly whether any of the leading members of the Bush administration and the neo-conservative intellectuals who encouraged the White House to march on Baghdad considered that war in Iraq might produce its own litter of degenerations.

After all, it now appears that many Army generals warned that maintaining law and order in Iraq would be much more difficult than simply ousting Saddam, that urban warfare would be horrible, and that casualties would rise. But the Cheney-Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz team had no intention of listening to professionals.

The second, more horrible form of degeneration is right before our eyes, in the photographs and videos of what went on in the Abu Ghraib prison and, as one now hears from the International Red Cross, in various other detention camps.

This has infuriated the world, and also shocked many Americans, who have hitherto had an incredibly high regard for their armed forces. Since the debacles of the Vietnam War, those forces were portrayed as having become much more professional, not only in higher levels of fighting efficiency but also in better discipline and codes of conduct.

Besides, they were told by their leaders, they were not likely to encounter a Vietnam-War-type deterioration in Iraq, because the bulk of Iraqis yearned to see American troops liberate them from Saddam Hussein.

This, too, is disturbing. American public opinion was fed optimistic messages while U.S. decision-makers were blind to the lessons of military history, which is that most wars get worse, not better, no matter the strength of your armed fist.

The cynical observer is bound to wonder whether the reason the Pentagon so furiously campaigned against the International Criminal Court over the past the past three or more years is precisely because it foresaw this might happen, somewhere in the future, and wanted to protect U.S. soldiers from international investigation and tribunal.

As the first form of degeneration spread, losses grew, and the fighting became more bloody and frustrating to young American troops, the second type of degeneration began to occur — not ten days ago, but last year. Exhausted by the conflict, annoyed that their promised return home had not been fulfilled, enraged at the death of buddies, certain American units treated their prisoners roughly.

Worst of all were the actions of the Army's prison guard units, who look to have been lower-rated and less disciplined troops, with many of the habits of warders of penitentiaries in the American South before civil rights reforms. To this can be added the misjudgments of middle officers, and the neglect of senior ones. With morale and conduct breaking down at various levels, dirty deeds were done.

War is hell. As Clausewitz so frequently warned, it rarely ends up where it was planned to conclude. This is something the neo-conservative strategists never thought about. Moral degeneration in war is something that the higher military leaders, although they worried that the post-battle situation would not be pleasant, did not anticipate. Mid-level officers, concerned to emphasize toughness and fortitude to their troops, forgot on occasions to stress the rules of war. Now a fine service is besmirched.

But the disastrous and unintended consequences of this degenerated behavior do not cease there. The United States has stepped further into the Iraqi quagmire, dragging the British, Australian, Polish, Italian, and other allied governments into the mud with it.

As it now turns to the United Nations for help — the organization Vice President Dick Cheney and company dismissed as irrelevant last year — it has no prospect of immediate support. This administration, if it is not too careful, has the chance of destroying the U.N. system, of which President Bush's father was such a strong supporter.

We desperately need a strong and respected Security Council to sort out the mire, but why should China or France get off their backsides and support America at this stage? Why should India stir itself when the United States is twisting in the wind?

How can the American public reconcile this news of blatant and grisly mistreatment of prisoners to its ideological and cultural claims to being a "city on the hill," a light to the nations, a torchbearer of democracy and human rights? The single photo of a young, raw, female recruit holding a naked Iraqi man on a dog leash is going to unbundle the Wolfowitzian dream of turning Iraq and the entire Middle East into something like Kansas.

All that hubris is blown apart and, beneath the surface, the murmurs about retreat and abandonment are rising, even inside Washington. Yet, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's departure, if it comes, will only fan the flames. The Arab world will rejoice, America's critics will say "I told you so," America's friends will take cover, and the mess will go on.

And June 30 — when sovereignty is scheduled to revert to Iraq — looms. Anyone who claims they know the outcome is, as George Bernard Shaw used to say, a charlatan. We are in for a turbulent ride. Once you start a war, never think you can control its degeneration and its consequences.

Photo Gallery of Abuses of Iraqi Prisoners of War

Related Articles     
    For Iraqi Women, Abu Ghraib's Taint
    New Details of Prison Abuse Emerge
    She Was Ordered to Pose for Abuse Pictures
    New Picture, Military Critics Increase Pressure ...
    American Soldiers Brutalized Iraqis
    Torture of Iraq Prisoners Prompts Wave of ...
    Iraq: US Military in Torture Scandal
    CBS Airs Photographs of Iraqi Prisoners ...
    Pressure Rises on Bush Team
    Shame of Abuse by British Troops in Iraq
    Bush's Power vs. Rights of Detained Citizens

Other Articles by Paul Kennedy
    Murdering Medecins Sans Frontieres?
    Now US Forces Stationed in 130 Countries

Paul Kennedy is the Dilworth Professor of History and Director of International Security Studies at Yale University and author or editor of 16 books on history, military strategy, diplomacy and international relations. His books include "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers."





  Related Articles     
    New Picture, Military Critics Increase Pressure ...
    American Soldiers Brutalized Iraqis
    Torture of Iraq Prisoners Prompts Wave of ...
    Iraq: US Military in Torture Scandal
    CBS Airs Photographs of Iraqi Prisoners ...
    Pressure Rises on Bush Team
    Shame of Abuse by British Troops in Iraq
    Bush's Power vs. Rights of Detained Citizens

The Seoul Times, Shinheung-ro 36ga-gil 24-4, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange