News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  Global Views
Global Views
South Korea as a Model for Ending Iraq War?
As US-N. Korea Peace Efforts Quicken
Nakid North Korean POWs in Busan— A group of nakid North Korean POWs (prisoner of war) are led by South Korean soldiers in Busan during Korean War (1950-53). This photo was taken by AP photo journalist Max Desfor.The Seoul Times file photo

As Washington wages a new battle over how to end the Iraq war, it's eyeing the Korean War as a model. Officially, that war never ended, even 57 years after hostilities. US troops remain there. What kind of model is that?

Oddly enough, that "model" appears to be moving quickly away from the status of no-war-but-no-peace on the Korean Peninsula. The idea of maintaining a permanent American force in South Korea doesn't seem as permanent as it once did. Korea may have another type of lesson for the Iraq war.

Recent events have given hope to some US diplomats that ending North Korea's nuclear program might lead to an end of the 1953 armistice along the 38th Parallel and a signing of a permanent peace treaty.

That sort of wishful thinking first cropped up in 1991, soon after the end of the cold war, which left North Korea without Soviet aid. But those hopes were dashed after North Korea was caught hiding its nuclear program. Last October, it finally exploded a crude nuclear device, which embarrassed its only ally, China. Diplomacy then quickened, with Chinese officials directly pushing North Korea to change its ways soon in order to keep stability in Northeast Asia.

In February, the regime of Kim Jong Il agreed to dismantle its nuclear reactor and reveal information of its nuclear capability in return for economic aid, such as oil and rice. On June 22, a high-level US official visited the capital, Pyongyang. And this Saturday, a delegation from the International Atomic Energy Agency will arrive to oversee the shutdown of the five-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon. These rapid developments may indicate a fundamental shift by Mr. Kim, who was quoted as seeing "signs of easing on the Korean Peninsula."

South Korean leaders even talk of a new "peace regime" in which the two economies are more and more integrated, leading possibly to an eventual political reunification.

But that hope is a great way off. North Korea must still take the next steps of revealing information about its nuclear program and destroying whatever exists of its nuclear arsenal. (Dispute remains over whether the October test actually showed weapons capability.)

Without those steps, the North has no hope of a US troop withdrawal. And it must also make amends with Japan for kidnapping a few of its citizens in decades past.

Verifying the location of the North's nuclear hardware will not be easy. But China is hoping that Kim has finally made the great leap toward opening his country to the world, and will adopt a market economy and end its impoverished status – much like Libya has done by ending its nuclear program.

If so, the world can expect a process of tit-for-tat diplomacy in coming months to establish trust between the US and North Korea, as well as between the two Koreas. On June 30, for instance, South Korea shipped the first part of a promised 400,000 tons of rice to its northern neighbor.

A critical step will be removal of the UN sanctions on North Korea, imposed last fall after the nuclear test. China now favors that, but the US must hold out until it sees real progress on nuclear disarmament.

Is there a model here for Iraq? Yes, in that Iran, as China did with Pyongyang, can push a reluctant Baghdad regime to reform. But that assumes China really can ensure North Korea disarms.

This article is from The Christian Science Monitor.




 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange