News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  Global Views
Obama: Camelot or Chameleon?
Special Contribution
by John Pierce
Barack Obama addresses an audience while on the road to the white house.

I'm one of those guys that grumbles about America's insistence on choosing Presidents based on personality. "In Europe, you vote for a platform, not a pretty face," I grouse. "Civilized nations have a parliamentary system." But in America, we elect the candidate most likely to sidle up next to you at the bar, order a cold beer and chat about the missus and the kids. Bah.

So here's Barack Obama, who has racked up two Kennedy endorsements in 24 hours. Yes, the Democrats want their warm fuzzies, their Camelot. Obama fans clamor for a sense of the future that is as bright as it is vague. While Hillary prescribes, "To solve this crisis, We must convene this congressional committee, and that congressional committee," Obama serves up a Rodney King-flavored "Why can't we all just get along?" and wins the hearts.

Alright, alright. I'm selling us a little short, I suppose. What Americans really look for in a candidate is a raw instinct for leadership, and are not that concerned with credentials or firm ideology. The results are usually disastrous, but not always. I'm thinking of Abraham Lincoln, woefully underestimated in his day, considered a lightweight by opponents and allies alike. He even invited political foes to serve in his cabinet. Because of his policy of "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer," his allegiances were maddeningly unclear. He led by gathering input from all sides, then made decisions based on how far he believed he could push the nation towards change – and not an inch farther. Ideologues thought him weak, wobbly, unsure of himself. Similarly, there's FDR, a man who entered the White House fully opposed to permanent benefits for the downtrodden, and was won over to that cause by liberal advisors. Not right away though. First he frustrated one and al

One wonders then, if Obama might be cut out of the same cloth, a man who will listen to all sides without much regard to ideology, who will frustrate "knowledgeable" observers by his insistence on giving each side their due, and end up doing something nation-saving, something inspirational, intuitive, even imaginative. Kennedy-esque? Nah. Think Lincoln-esque. He's already an Illinois lawyer. All he needs is a beard and a black suit.

John Pierce
unai.astorkiza@wanadoo.es




 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange