Progressive Lawmaker Speaks Out on Sejong City Plan
Q2: Why does your party support the original Sejong City project? A2: We need to come up with the ideas and ways to equally distribute the resources of the capital city of Seoul to achieve balanced development of the nation, when it comes to the construction of Sejong City. We, as our party policy, consented to the idea of Sejong City at the previous 17th National Assembly. We still stick to our original plan for the Sejong City construction. There is no change. Q3: The President plans to build a self-sufficient and a scientific city instead of relocating the ministries. Doing so would also help to reduce the crowding in Seoul. Is such a plan acceptable to your party and the opposition in general? If not, why? A3: So far, it seems to me that the government is unwilling to relocate government ministries to the new Sejong City. This means that the president is not going to honor the original plan. By moving the government ministries to the new city, the chronic problems of overpopulation in Seoul will be much relieved. And correspondingly, the crazy housing prices in the capital city will be decreased. Particularly, even the ruling GNP (Grand National Party) members, except for pro-Lee Myung-Bak politicians, are all opposed to the revision of the plan. So, I guess that chances are nil that they would accept any revision to the plan.
Q4: Rep. Park Geun-Hye's position has sent ripples in Grand National Party (GNP). There are two strong warring factions in GNP. Does this show a crack, which can make GNP weak? A4: Yes. People's trust in GNP would be much weakened as the two differing factions within GNP keep fighting each other. I mean the fight between Park Geun-Hye (former GNP party chairwoman) and the current President Lee Myung-Bak. Responsible political party should keep their own promises they made to the people. They should not break it.
Q5: President Roh's plan to relocate government ministries was ruled unconstitutional by the Constitutional court. You have President at one place, certain ministries at one place and a few other ministries at other place. Now won't that affect the smooth functioning of the administration? A5: As aforementioned, the Sejong City plan would turn out to be very effective in the balanced development of the country as government ministries and other public organizations would be relocated to the new city from already heavily concentrated Seoul area. We urge once again the government and President Lee to stick to their promise for the people and process the original plan.
Left Moves to Far-Left, Right Moves to ...
Sarkozy’s Financial Transaction Tax, ...
NRI’s Dandi 2.0
Blame the Pitches, Mate!!
"S. Korea Can Learn from Australian Experience ...
Midterm -- Democrats' Curse for Obama's 2012?
Yet Another Apology, Eh?
Liberal Democrats Should Support Conservatives
Is it the End of European Dream?
Can Park Stall Chung and Lee's Sejong City?
What Effect Will Dalai Lama Have on Chimerica?
"Pakistan Also Hub to Middle East, Central ...
Model Six-Party Talks
Yukio Hatoyama: 100 Days, East Asia and U.S.
Pakistani Envoy Talks with Local Journalists
Whom to Blame: Law or Men?
A Different Korea Sparkling
Is Corruption Cool and Acceptable?
Who Else Has the Right to Vote?
Indian Embassy Celebrates the Republic Day
Mr. Abhishek Joshi serves as associate editor of The Seoul Times. He graduated from the School of Electrical Engineering of Seoul National University. He was also a member of SNU Quill, first English magazine from Seoul National University, as a writer.
The Seoul Times
Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6
Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:email@example.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company ST Banner Exchange