News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  America
Architect of China's Quest for Military Dominance
By Bill Costello
Education Columnist
What if Deng Xiaoping, the architect of China’s economic rise, was also secretly the architect of China’s quest for military dominance? It’s not a far-fetched theory.

Two decades ago, Deng advised his colleagues to “hide your brightness, bide your time.”

The way to move stealthily would be to focus on economics first. A strong economy is a prerequisite for a strong military.

By personally handpicking all of the top leaders who have succeeded him—Hu Yaobang, Zhao Ziyang, Jiang Zemin, and Hu Jintao—Deng increased the
likelihood that his long-term plan would be carried out.

Deng’s plan would have been shaped by the large body of historical evidence that supports the concept that empires rise or fall based on their economies.

Take the British Empire, for example. Over a century ago, it expanded from economic to military to political power. At its height, the British Empire accounted for roughly a quarter of the world’s land surface. However, Britain’s global dominance ended when its economy deteriorated.

Fast forward to present day China. China’s economy is the world’s second largest in terms of purchasing power parity and the third largest based on current exchange rates.

If China overtakes the U.S. to become the world’s largest economy in the near future—as is widely predicted—then China is also likely to overtake
the U.S. in terms of military spending.

China is already causing concern among the U.S.’s top military leaders because its military spending has roughly doubled over the past decade.

U.S. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, recently said he is “genuinely concerned” about China’s “heavy investments” in sea and air capabilities.

Deng’s plan, if he had one, would seem to be working thus far.

In fact, an outside factor seems to be contributing to its fruition: the U.S. financial crisis. The U.S. debt is threatening not just the nation’s economy, but also its national security.

“Our financial health is directly related to our national security,” explained Admiral Mullen during a recent interview.

During a speech at the Brookings Institution, U.S. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said: “Spain under the Habsburgs, France under Louis XVI, the Ottoman Empire in the 19th century, the British Empire in the 20th—all of them were crippled by borrowing, by interest payments, by debt. We are not exempt. In every era, these fiscal issues are questions of national security and national success.”

To address this dilemma, President Obama’s deficit-reduction commission is considering recommendations to reduce military spending. While this would help bring the U.S. deficit under control, it would also afford China the opportunity to close the gap in military spending.

Currently, the gap is substantial. In 2009, military spending was $661 billion in the U.S. and $100 billion in China.

However, the moving picture may be more telling than the snapshot when considering that China is the world’s fastest-growing major economy and the U.S. is facing a financial crisis.

The degree to which U.S. military spending can be reduced without undermining national security is a delicate balancing act. Reduce spending too much, and the military loses dominance. Reduce spending too little, and the economy declines, bringing the military with it.

Whether or not Deng was secretly the architect of China’s quest for military dominance is not certain.

However, if Deng were alive today, his advice to a nation lacking a road map to greater economic and military power would be to “cross the river by feeling the stones.”



Related Articles
    Importing Brazil’s Oil Policy
    China’s Insight into Human Nature
    America’s Shanghai Surprise
    The Chinese Ant and the American Grasshopper
    Liberty Starts in School
    The Erosion of American Higher Education
    The Federal Takeover of Education
    The Schools Scandal
    National Education Association Selling its Saul
    The Fiscal Burden of Educating Children of ...
    Fixing American Dumbocracy
    The Last American Skill
    Malaysiannovation
    Can Innovation Thrive in Singapore?
    Koreativity
    Universities in Hong Kong Focus on Innovation
    Why U.S. Immigration Policy Needs Tweaking
    South Korean Teachers Reach for the SKY


Bill Costello, M.Ed., is a U.S.-based education columnist, blogger, and author of Awaken Your Birdbrain: Using Creativity to Get What You Want. He can be reached at www.makingmindsmatter.com

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 82-10-6606-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange